Christianity as antiquity.-- When we hear the ancient bells growling on a Sunday morning we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! This, for a jew, crucified two thousand years ago, who said he was God's son? The proof of such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and the fact that the claim is believed - whereas one is otherwise so strict in examining pretensions - is perhaps the most ancient piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts, but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function and ignominy of the cross -- how ghoulishly all this touches us, as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such things are still believed-Nietzsche
JC joseph and mary were not on the tax rolls the romans compiled. Horus [ egypt1000 bc] has the exact same story as JC. the whole ruse is not even worth the effort I'm taking typing this !!
What are you seeking out of this silly question?
And are you asking why are people silly enough to believe that Jesus is the sun of God?
If that the case, if it ain't written down, well it never happened.
It’s a quote by Neitzsche. It’s an observation made by a famous philosopher.
I guess you’ve never seen a typographical error @Gwendolyn2018. Odd thing for a college professor.
Oddly enough, when you make a typographical error on a smart phone the software can autocorrect the mistake. In this case it corrected “student” to “stud not.” The statement should have been “Neitzsche was a student of history and philosophy.” I really see no problems with that statement on its face and I think anyone would reasonably interpret it in that manner.
As for primeval and prehistory, you’d have to ask Neitzsche what he meant. I took him to be speaking figuratively. Of course, he could have been speaking about the Zoroastrianism foundations of Judaism, and thus Christianity. I’m not sure and I don’t care.
@Gwendolyn2018 I certainly don’t care about your attitude, but I would like to invite you to just ignore my posts.
Bit of a mix up there. All sorts of traditions and beliefs which evolved over time. It's a bit of this and a bit of that,ancient Jewish spiritual teachings,OT prophesy,early Christian beliefs and myths,later Roman influences and eventually 1000s of years of Catholic dogma and more layers of mythology,manipulation and hypocracy.
Nietzsche was a stud not of history and a philosopher.
I have a question. How could he talk after he was crucified? We never learned that in Jewish Sunday School.
Depends upon what you mean by after?