Where do you draw the line between run-of-the-mill Bible Thumpers and Cults?
How do you react? Does it matter to you? Do you treat them the same?
In P.I.E.Bonnewitz book "Real Magic" (later editions) has a "is it a cult" test. The most telling trait is what he calls "the creepy factor", however mandatory conformity is always a big hint.
The "creepy factor"? That's not subjective at all.
"Creepy factor" is the mathematical relationship between, strength of believers, personality of leadership, rigidity of practice, the overwhelming sense of being right or chosen or superior by divine right. violent tendencies and actions, an inherent need to break with basic social interaction, denial of science/education, and about 20 more categories
I was told, long ago, that if the founder of the group is alive, it's a cult. If he's dead, its a religion.a religious scholar told me that the basic Christian belief is that if the religion is not based on the gospel, the first 5 books of the bible, then it is a cult. (Think Mormons, Scientologists, Unification Church...et, al.)
I don't think so...where does that leave Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, even Buddhism.
I have a slightly broader definition of a cult. If a religion teaches you that you are morally superior to other people just from believing in a structured set of beliefs, then you belong to a cult. I have often been accused of belonging to a cult by Traditional Christians simply because my New Thought beliefs aren't in line with their specific denominational teachings. Ironic, I know, but irony is usually lost on those folks. #MAGA. (also ironic).
Now days I don't really care. I'm in here and happy.
There are no lines between any belief system from atheism to theism
I rather agree with Sassygirl3869. Cults depend on a charismatic central figure in the form of an actual living person (not just a dead figure-head), who commands out-sized authority and uses it to isolate members away from their other social connections. That is not all religion. BUT, it IS quite a few offshoots of Christianity that claim to be mainstream Christianity. Bottom line for me is, all religions deal in fantasy and wishful thinking. Cults are, additionally, led by individuals severely lacking in accountability to others. Pope? Head of the Mormon church? I think they get accused by other Jesus advocates as being a cult in large part because of that very form of unquestioned leadership. It's a judgment call to some extent. We could accuse many Protestant splinter groups of the same thing and might have a point.
same delusional lot. all with an over active front right lobe. medication may help !
Cults will isolate people from their friends and families to brainwash them. Cults are worse. Cults also take possessions and money from converts and stuff them their own coffers. The only bible thumper I personally know is my nurse who keeps a professional distance. Her husband is a Baptist preacher and I've never met him or plan to.
I think that one indicator would be that people start making irrational decisions that they would not normally make, based on the direction of the cult leader.
That's another interesting distinction. With "backsliders" or people who begin to question the leader, they are usually required to provide penance through action. Religions in general tend to be a lot more forgiving of those who aren't as faithful.
Also, ever notice that with cult leaders, they themselves do not have to hold themselves to the same standards they require their followers to do? They rationalize their exemption, as irrational as it might be, but the conditioning keeps the followers in line.
There is no difference between bible thumpers and cults. Religions are the most followed cults in the world. I find it so amazing that normally intelligent people can accept and follow, become ensnared and blinded by such mindless teachings. Why are they so blind ? Neither the realist nor the bible thumper is open to any deciding argument, so there is no point in pursuing the subject.
I admit I have to smile at those who are fanatical or really passionate about getting me to believe with them . I have a lot of patience because I am secure in my own beliefs. And often I learn something from them . Learning about others faiths and practices is fine with me.
It's all a cult at some level. It just comes in many degrees of crazy.
They are all and the same at the lowest denominator. Why waste time in categories, sub divisions and classifications.
its a cult when it stops them from living a normal life.
Bible thumper person who lives with his kids and wife, works a job, has hobbies.
As opposed to a cult person who lives in some group home with non-relatives and spends hours a day chanting and growing kale.
I don't usually treat bible thumpers differently than anyone else. I just don't have the energy to be mean to people.
key point ...kale
To be honest, I think "regular" religious people are more dangerous to society at large.
@buck1977 Plus, without moderates, extremists lose their ability to gain members, support, and funds. Imagine how the world would view someone who believes in one of mankind's dead gods, and proselytized about how he was going to smite those that don't believe and repent. Is he really going to convince anyone to do anything other than maybe offer him their leftovers? That's how all cult members would be viewed if there were no "regular" believers.
Except generally speaking, religious people are upfront about who they are, whereas as cults have a tendency to do a bait and switch. Everyone is still operating under the premise that a cult has to have a religious angle. Scientology doesn't, neither does HerbaLife, or just about any other pyramid scheme that hooks you with better health or wealth promise. THOSE ARE CULTS TOO!
@LucifersPen Yes, and just like the religious extremists, the MLM extremists would be nothing without their moderates. My theory holds up.