This has always been a thing with me, the claim that in the "afterlife" our "souls" will either experience eternal happiness and bliss, or eternal pain and torment. But I see a problem with this thinking beyond the concept of life after death itself.
Consider the following:
Scenario -1 : *You eat a piece of chocolate and experience both a pleasant physical and emotional reaction - the enjoyment of the taste of the chocolate as it melts in your mouth and the contentment you feel as a result of this.
The point of this is that emotions and physical responses are entirely the product of a central nervous system, a complex organic system which receives input from our senses, is processed by the brain and is then experienced either physically and/or emotionally by the individual.
The soul is not a complex organic system, it is the spiritual, non-corporeal remnant of the complex organic system that is now sitting in an urn on your widow's mantle. Since the soul has shed its organic shell, there is no way it can experience physical or emotional stimuli of any kind. Ostensibly then, if Hell were real, any souls condemned there would feel no pain and, conversely, any souls in Heaven would experience no joy. The complex organic system that processed those stimuli is dead.
So a soul, if it were real, would be immune to suffering and incapable of emotion. If it reacted with these responses to a given stimuli, it would have to be as a result of it merely remembering what sort of response a given stimuli should generate. Of course memory is also a product of the same complex organic system that is now dead so it wouldn't be capable of that either.
Which means all this shit about a soul is just more religious detritus to be set out on the curb for the garbage truck of reason to haul away.
Arguments like this are why it would be kinda fun to have some theists around to see what their counterpoints would be.
- Sgt. Spanky
Drop and give me 20
Einstein taught us all matter is a form of energy, so since energy can neither be created nor destroyed, we have always existed and will always exist in some energy form. No reason to think souls don't exist, and quantum physics already tells us different dimensions exist.
"For physicists, the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion." -Einstein
If one accepts evolution while adhering to the notion of a soul (as the Catholic Church has done), one must ask, at what point in our evolutionary development did this so-called ‘eternal soul’ evolve? Did earlier hominids have souls? Are the souls of Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy) still wandering the African plains, 3 million years after their deaths? Or, if souls were evolved, did earlier attempts fail and fall short, only living a few moments after the death of the host?
If human beings were to have souls, they most certainly would be a natural (as opposed to miraculous) phenomenon. That is, unless one believes in supernatural interference. If souls are natural, then they would necessarily be composed of matter and/or energy, and thus measurable. To date, I have yet to see any data on the composition, structure, mass, weight, newtons or joules of a soul.