@Matias Not sure how I would reply, but I know that this individual's interpretation of the divine is uniquely his/hers. We know that in nature there are no two organisms or objects of any kind that are identical. It seems absurd to me, and rather arrogant, to believe that my subjective interpretation of a being that cannot be accurately described, has never been seen or heard and will never be geolocated, may be exported to others.

The most hubristic and overbearing people are those who take it upon themselves to prosletyze, or bear witness for their faith. The prophets, preachers, apostles and missionaries are, and have been, among the most delusional. They never seem to understand that their experience, their 'truth' is entirely their own and that whatever they feel has been 'revealed' to them is necessarily limited to the first person. Here again, my avatar said it best.

"It is a contradiction in terms and ideas to call anything a revelation that comes to us at second hand, either verbally or in writing. Revelation is necessarily limited to the first communication. After this, it is only an account of something which that person says was a revelation made to him; and though he may find himself obliged to believe it, it cannot be incumbent on me to believe it in the same manner, for it was not a revelation made to me, and I have only his word for it that it was made to him."
Thomas Paine, 'The Age of Reason'