I've felt for a long time that those who cling to religious beliefs, or seek to have them, tend to share a common trait - I call it an "intolerance for ambiguity".
In other words, some people high on that trait require answers and explanations to events in the world, and seek formulas to apply or rituals to perform that may control or assure outcomes in their favor. Conversely, those who are low on that trait are content with ambiguity in the world, don't requiring explanations for events, and do not seek formulas to apply or rituals to perform to accomplish the results they seek.
Of course, this has not been researched yet; but I'm curious what you think about this theory, if you have an interest in psychology.
I think you have something, here. Certainly the most religious people I have known were pretty rigid and needed things to fit into their world view.
There is much research on this topic. But your use of the word "trait" is inappropriate. A trait is an inherited characteristic. What you are talking about is a pattern of behavior.
You are correct in your observation. Read Erich Fromm's ESCAPOE FROM FREEDOM.
I Can't agree with you @wordywalt. A trait does not have to be inherited it can be learnt. For example "American insouciance to the harm done to people around the world during its pursuit of gold , oil and control of opium is a developed trait not inherited".
[thefreedictionary.com]
@FrayedBear That use of the word is also inappropriate. One cannot justify one's erroneous use of a term by referring to another erroneous use of the term. Also, the word is "learned", not l"earnt.."
@wordywalt Perhaps where you come from but where I came from it is learnt -
[thefreedictionary.com]
Furthermore please explain what in your opinion is erroneous in my use of the word "trait"?
Actually, the characteristics I describe may very well be inherited, as well as possibly correlated to intelligence. Until a proper study is done though, it's all just a matter of opinion.
That is a very good hypothesis. Some people must have a "god of the gaps" in knowledge. It is better to be of a scientific mind: can't wait to see what's next. Whether "we" ever know totally what is what, so what? Always having to learn is more fun if people are not scaring and hurting each other over it.
It is a common human trait to feel apprehensive if one can not control ones environment or future. It is also a common human trait to want answers.
Religion fulfills both of these needs readily. It provides "answers" wether factual or not and provides prayers, spells, and rituals to make people feel like they are taking control.
Atheist tend to accept what they do not know and accept it when answers are not available. What was before the universe? I don't know and will live my entire life without "knowing". It does not affect me so I don't care.
If I can not control wether I die tomorrow in a car accident, I simply accept that. No amount of time on a Ouija Board will change the outcome. So for now I do the best to live my life to its fullest and do whatever one can to contribute to mankind and the world.
If I am correct these are the differences of outlook on life you are speaking of.
Those low in intolerance for ambiguity sounds like the trumpsters. They are content with what the Pubs are trying to do. They are the Religious Right and don't question how the division of church and state is blurring with this scary administration. They go with the herd and don't question why the Right is trying to make the US a whiter country by bigoted immigration policies.