Which is potentially more violent: threatened male identity or threatened 'white' identity? The Guardian examines the white male dominated extreme right.
[theguardian.com]
I don't pretend to know. The so-called "incels" movement does not seem to have an overt racial element to it, I would presume that a latino or asian or black man could at least in theory consider themselves "involuntarily celibate". But I would be unsurprised to find that the incel movement is primarily white ... let's see ... yeah, sure enough: "Self-identified incels are mostly white, male, and heterosexual." per [en.wikipedia.org] with three citations provided.
So maybe ultimately it all comes back to the loss of WASP hegemony, at least here in 'Murica. Subgroups that don't have an explicit racial complaint or dynamic, like the incels, still are displaying white privilege in another context.
@KateZilla It occurs to me after reading these articles that I was married to an incel from 1986-1997. After our divorce it took him another decade to drink himself to death.
One of the highlights of being married to him - I went with him to his high school reunion. Everybody there was in shock that "Johnny got married" and they all came in little bunches to stare at me as if I was a member of a freak show, simply because I married an ugly handicapped dude they went to high school with. I spent the majority of my marriage in a rage either at the way people treated him, or the way he treated me.
I can state with absolute certainty that "getting laid" can't fix what's wrong with these guys.