Agnostic.com

6 6

I just watched Battle for Sevastopol on Amazon. pretty good biography of a woman sniper,( Pavlichencko) in the Russian Army during WW2

btroje 9 Sep 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Sounds interesting, will have to check it out.

1

I've seen a lot of information about her. She was a major propaganda tool for the Red Army to recruit women. They didn't have to fabricate any details of her exploits in combat, even though they no doubt embellished political aspects, but that's the norm.

She was an inspiration to a wartorn country on the verge of defeat as well as a serious threat to the German invaders.

JimG Level 8 Sep 5, 2018
1

That is a great movie. I have watched it twice, Enemy at The Gate is another similar and great movie also.

0

How do I find it?

its on Amazon prime, you can put in her name or the name of the movie

2

Sounds interesting..

Since I am not in history class I don't memorize names but there was a guy in the Russian military that was a master sniper . THe movie Enemy at the Gate covered him. I have heard more about him. This woman Pavlichenko shot 309 Germans and did a lot of other awesome warrior acts. The movie just makes me want to know more about her

@btroje
I think I'll watch that... it looks interesting...

2

Collusion !!!! ?????

Eleanor Roosevelt had this sniper (name blocking) and a bunch of other commies in the white house with her

@btroje has it been going on since then?????.... (You know I would say whatever just because, right?).... By the way, what's with the (name blocking)???? ??? .... Oh I get it, spoil alert? Anyhow, the Roosevelt started socialism back in the day, didn't they? That may explain the commies thing.... dunno

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:172286
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.