Where the Mind Goes
Energy Flows
Results Grow
Perhaps @MARKram you might consider this one
He who believes he should carelessly open his mind
Likely does not mind what he is open to carelessly believe.
you can practice this one... since you came up with it!
LOL... this conversation of yours, just proved everything in the proverb!
I could give you some hints ,,,, but you proved ... it would be useless to you!
At your age... if you believe in god... May he bless you!
@MARKram
OH dear, I am level 8 on an agnostic site and you ask if I believe in god?
You are priceless, even if sarcasm does go right over your head.
Oh by the way an ellipsis is three dots not four commas
None of us can ... and I wonder if he sees his own reply.
You are misquoting Tony Robins and T. Harv Eker
“Where attention goes, energy flows and results show” T. Harv Eker
"WHERE FOCUS GOES, ENERGY FLOWS" Tony Robbins
They are, in my view deepities -- noble sounding but ultimately meaningless statements.
Certainly, it's true so far as it goes that where you direct energy and effort, some result will obtain, but there's absolutely no guarantee it will be the desired result.
@mordant Love that word! Daniel Dennett's contribution to the vernacular. And from Richard Dawkins we get the term "meme." I have found that deepities, such as the utterances of people like Deepak Chopra, can become memes within a certain subculture.
@MARKram
I think you are confusing
What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole (2006)
and
What the Bleep Do We Know!? [2004]
They are different films, same writer but different films
@LenHazell53 ... yes you can get confused very easily ... I can see from your very first comment.
My recommendation to you is " Give Up while you still have some gray matter left inside your head, to keep you breathing.
@MARKram So according to you, a cup of shit is bad, and so you immediately serve one up. Pegs the ol' irony meter.
"Shit" by the way is not me failing to agree with you. It is hurling insults, which, you'll notice, I in no way did. I simply observed there's a difference between actual science, and the pseudoscience you're advocating.
If you want to "try to help" then do not advance an ideology and pitch a snit when it's not instantly and uncritically accepted and do not claim it is evidenced and substantiated without offering evidence or substantiation for it.
@MARKram "The lady doth protest too much, methinks"
@MARKram
"yes you can get confused very easily " Especially when you pretend to know what you are talking about and then make silly mistakes that prove you don't and are in fact just bullshitting.