If you had a magic wand of enlightenment and could get stubborn people to learn one supported fact. What would it be?
Today, mine would be that spanking and hitting does more harm to a child, than help with teaching a child how to behave live a decent human.
That there are other sentient, life-loving beings on this planet who have as much a right to it as we do.
I don't know when I was just a kid back in grade school the threat of a hack sure kept me in line it also teaches you that the world is a mean place and if you do wrong it will hurt you it's just a lesson in reality I'm not saying you should beat a child I'm saying that a SWAT on the ass will change a young man's mind
Compound answer: To recognize what a (faith) belief without evidence, claim is and be able to fully appreciate the total lack of merit any faith based claim should have in evaluating truth; To recognize faith asserted as truth is dishonest.
" Spanking and hitting does more harm to a child, than help with teaching a child how to behave live a decent human."
Is that a supported fact?
That vaccines work, and not a conspiracy manufactured by Big Pharma.
vaccines work you bunch of google scientists
Yes, that is a hard one. It only took one unethical scientist to screw that up. When you explain what happened in the vaccine field. The stubborn parent tells you that it was a "witchhunt". I think that parents that do not get mandatory vaccines for children when they can afford them should be held responsible for medical neglect.
Well said!
The poor need way more help than we're giving them
There vs their vs they're
Ha..ha..
And its versus it's, amirite??
We (well 12 of us) did go to the moon. There are too many people here (north west England) who love to say, 'We never went' then add nothing to back that up. In support of my statement I refer people to Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy web site which is full of good and easy to read information.
Oh..the moon travel is a conspiracy bit.
I'd like people to realise that it's possible, and indeed perfectly ok, to change one's opinion when presented with a better alternative. For example, during a recent meeting at work I put forward a suggestion to which I'd given a lot of thought and which would have been viable. A colleague then put forward her own suggestion which I could immediately see was better than my own, being equally likely to work but far easier to put into place - so I immediately switched my position, dropped my suggestion and supported hers. Several people, including the colleague whose suggestion I was now backing, found this very funny and I asked why. "You just said something completely different two minutes ago!" they said. So I explained - "Yes I did, but Helene's suggestion is better than mine, so I've changed my mind." Based on the several seconds of silent, blank stares that followed, it seems the very concept that it's possible to do that was completely alien and came as something of a shock.
Too true. Many people do not think things through it take in alternative information. So, they think you're "flip-flopping". But, you're actually being intellectually adept, open-minded, and just plain reasonable. Even your approach that your idea was "viable" shows an outlook not a fixed stance. Kudos!
That there is no god-we are our own gods.
Yes, that is a big one in the U.S. I would like that too. I would even appreciate if people stuck to the kinder tenants of the Bible, instead of using it only when it is convenient to their argument that is an excuse to mistreat people.
@alanalorie What kinder elements?
Probably only the one verse: Luke 6:31 Do to others as you would have them do to you.
The rest is nonsense about controlling women's behavior and punishing people.
@birdingnut I like the good Samaritan parable...to help others, even those that are different and not-well-liked by others. Often when help occurs in some people, it is only directed to people in their own in-group, (wealthy people helping wealthy people).
@alanalorie Yes, a few parables are kind, but Jesus also told the parable about the king who tried to crown his son as king also, and some of his subjects wouldn't accept the son as king, so he had them slaughtered. Not very nice..accept Jesus or get fried in hell or chopped in pieces.