She is not saying she's Native American or a member of any particular tribe. She said, and has always maintained, that there was a family story that there was some Native American ancestry. The DNA test proves that. So in this instance she is verifiably not a 'fake, phony fraud'.
@Gooniesnvrdie @ArturoS

Many people end up surprised by their DNA results.

However, there are frauds that profit from obvious and purposeful frauds.

[nordic.businessinsider.com]

@Gooniesnvrdie I definitely understand the desire to try and ignore this shit, but I believe it's still necessary to call out cheeto jesus on his lies.

@Gooniesnvrdie I try not to be...

Not worth the discussion.

@kmdskit3 The point is that she in fact did say she had NA ancestry on her app...[huffingtonpost.com] .... So why would she do that, what could she possibly gain from saying it then? We all know that Affirmative Action plays a big part in hiring situations. Its a rhetorical question; The whole point is that affirmative action must be taken by covered employers to recruit and advance qualified minorities, women, etc.. That being said, the dna test she took will show positive for ancestry from Alaska, Canada, North America, Mexico, any country in Central America and South America... She could have Guatemalan heritage and gotten that same 64/1000 positive test result.. Do you not see how intellectually dishonest this is.. Hell, I have actual proof of being 1/8 Cherokee but I would never claim to be a Native American on a job application... There is a huge difference.

@Captain_Feelgood Thank you for providing a link to a reliable source. I had never heard her say that she considered herself N.A. With such a low percentage of her ancestry being N.A. that would truly be an absurd statement but her claiming N.A. ancestry from a DNA test done by a world renowned geneticist at Stanford is very acceptable. If you can post a link from another world renowned geneticist questioning these findings please do. In the article from your link she said she told Penn and Harvard of her exaggerated heritage AFTER she was hired. I couldn't find anything in the article about using this in any job application. The article does say that both schools and she used this after her hiring so not sure how affirmative action hiring practices had anything to do with this. Once again please provide a reliable source. Of course she and these schools using this exaggerated ancestry in the name of diversity IS reprehensible. Getting back to the original point I, and also many others, made is that once again tRump makes a promise, exactly like the promise to give money away if Obama could prove he was an American born citizen, and then when proven wrong reneges on said promise.

Not sure how this relates to my post. All I'm saying is she verified her story that, like her family has told her, she has some Native American ancestry and tRump reneged on another promise.

@kmdskit3 agree...one's heritage is important...that is my point...it used to be that a person could be discriminated against for even having one drop of African American blood...funny how that does not seem to bother tRUMP or his supporters now...he is a crook that does not keep his financial promises once again...