@Jacar IMO Peterson is Chopra lite. He uses obfuscation in the place of clear speech often to both sound more important & to obscure his message. If he was half as smart as he thinks he is he would be twice as smart as he actually is. I am NOT a Peter-son. I don't like him, I seldom agree with his "Proud Boys" message or his xtian apologetics. I don't know what you are going on about, except that it demonstrates a lot of what this video states about his fan-boys!

YO! phxbillcee! Are you one of those people that thinks every interaction with another human must be an argument, a debate, with a winner?

This was a CONVERSATION. Where one human actually listened for comprehension. It was NOT a discussion about who is correct.

And it is a great presentation of Jordan's ideas. Oz did good.

"Problem?" As with all famous persons there are haters. In this case the haters are mostly from a group of really stupid. Jordan has been providing a perspective that is more science based than most regressives are able to handle.

He is hated just like Saad, Harris, Pinker, Dawkins, Fry, Dillahunty, AronRa, are hated. They all use the process of science to arrive at reality. Those who do not like Jordan are all about how they feel, not about what is true.

This following BBC interview is excellent. The interviewer is good. She presents many of the objections to some of Peterson's "comments" only to learn that he did not say those words and did not do those things, as they have been reported.

Most people like Peterson won't own up, or take credit/responsibility because their hypocrisy keeps them from doing so. For most hypocrites it appears difficult to admit a lack of sympathy or empathy or caring for their fellows in mankind. Partly, one could hope, out of guilt, but more likely because they simply don't care beyond the looks of societal norms. Peterson and his ilk want to influence others and take advantage of those who are easily influenced. They do so for their own political and financial gains.