Our money/currency system in the U.S. is based on debt and not on anything having intrinsic value. Is there a point at which under this system debt becomes so large as to disallow the creation of more money/currency?
"Fiat money is currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but it is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material from which the money is made." The user trusts that the government's minted currency has exchange value.
The government can print as much money as it wants, so it can pay off any debt, however the more currency in crculation the less valuable its currency can become....inflation. Some countries have tried to print their way out of debt only to find their currency became virtually worthless.
Modern Money Theory suggests that governments enter into debt with instruments such as bonds in order to control the amount of money in the economy, which is supposed to effect inflation, but the government could have just as easily created more money, assuming that the issuance of additional capital does not impair trust in the value of the government's minted currency.
I met Steve Axelrod at a social gathering in College Park, MD at about 1984. Steve was the manager of the Open Market Committee for the Federal Reserve, looking like the typical banker with a tweed suit and vest. When I learned he worked for the Fed, I asked him "How do you know how much money to put into the economy?" "That depends on how much unemployment you want (or can tolerate)." was his answer. He also said that he was the originator of a measure of the amount of money in circulation called M1, M2 and M3 at that time, but that is apparently no longer used.
I dunno, but it's fucking ridiculous when I can wave a pile of money at people and they look at it like it's a dead fish because it's not credit.