The Steele Dossier. Thus far, nothing in the dossier has been proven false. Several things have born fruit as proven true, and other things while not proven true, have not been proven false either, but are consistent with Trumps behavior.
The thing is, the dossier was initiated by the RNC. It was abandoned by the RNC, but then picked up by the DNC as opposition research. Michael Steele is a respected ex-British intelligence officer who did not have an axe to grind with Trump. He was doing the job he was hired to do. He didn't have a dog in the fight (I hate that saying for what it implies, but it fits the present context).
We can only talk about the things in the dossier that after forensic examination have been found to be true. Those things are therefore fact. All other things that are so far still unproved must not be assumed to be true just because they have not been shown to be false. Whilst agreeing that Mr. Steele was commissioned to compile the dossier because of his expertise and not his bias, this does not mean than we can take everything he says as true without corroboration.
That is true. Although much of what has not been corroborated is consistent with patterns of behavior exhibited by Trump. But yes, acceptance is waiting on forensic analysis for verifivation.
@t1nick Agreed, and in all likelihood is fairly accurate.