@Cutiebeauty I would argue the house doesn't need any help in being portrayed as a negative. The article is suggesting that these women who have already in some degree shown they are going to fall in line with the establishment politicians they're embedded with. Policies they are proposing and backing together lack any real substance to fight against war or inequality. OC's own green deal lacks any job creation and actually offers a means to corporate involvement in which further enriches them. It is a stolen program from the green party which under their development also addressed those issues as it would be implemented. All of them, I believe, voting and backing Pelosi as speaker of the house. Who doesn't have a progressive bone in her body and will most likely fight much of anything they claim to support.

( 2020 promises to reach a crescendo of absurdity when it comes to diversity hustles being unleashed by two faced candidates. Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Corey Booker, Beto O’Rourke, Bernie Sanders and a slew of “I’m one of you” scam artists will flock to Iowa to push their qualification through the prism of identity. They will promise change, pander and throw out platitudes, each one throwing crumbs to marginalized groups. They will go toe-to-toe with a Donald Trump who has also perfected the swindle of speaking to people’s grievance. If you found yourself getting upset because I included one of your political heroes, just know that is how the diversity hustle works. It’s easy to see when others get jived, a lot harder to understand when you are the one being hustled.)

In 2 years I have little doubt most of the new people coming in will be among the list of names above. And a big reason for this is because a large number of them come from a career of military and intelligence back grounds. They will continue to support the military complex and corporations that come with it.