Stupid woman. Why doesn't stick to acting in crappy movies ?
2
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
5 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.Well... a lot of folks have been calling Tom Brady and his personal health guru nuts for at least three years now, and that dude just lead his team to a Super Bowl victory at the age of 41.
Meanwhile, Gwyneth Paltrow is 46 years old and looks like she’s in her early 30’s.
Madonna, who people also call a cook for her health regemine, is almost 60 and looks like she’s in her 40’s.
I’ll start calling these people cooks when they start looking like someone who has smoked a pack of Chesterfields and drank a quart of cheap whiskey every single day for 40 years.
webbew1
Level 7
Feb 6, 2019
0
I don't know anything about the others health regimes but they all have lots of money for pampering and expensive makeup, not to say plastic surgery and lots of spare time to spend with their personal trainers. She looks good for her age and so do many other women, that's not the point. She is selling expensive junk to gullible women who probably think they will look as good without putting in the effort. For instance what are "biofrequency stickers"?
Netflix, where the less a movie is liked, the longer it remains. They removed their review feature because so many of their movies were badly received. No surprise they'd promote Paltrow.
chalupacabre
Level 8
Feb 6, 2019
0
you think that because she is an idiot, at least in this regard, and sells a potentially harmful product, that means her movies are crappy? what does one thing have to do with another? stick to the issue.
g
genessa
Level 8
Feb 6, 2019
0
Ok maybe her movies aren't crappy. I'm not sure if I have seen any of them but the only reason she can flog this pseudo science is because she is famous for being an actor. She is taking advantage of gullible people and conning them for monetary gain.
@Moravian i agree totally. so stick to the issue, which you have correctly stated, and judge her movies when you've seen them, or at least heard from others you trust (who have seen them) that they're crappy lol. (that would not be me; i have seen little of her. what i saw was good. that has nothing to do with goop of course.) james woods was a brilliant actor. he blew me away in holocaust. there was an episode of e.r., a show i rarely watched, in which he brought me to tears. have you seen his politics? he's a MORON! i don't know why it doesn't, or didn't, affect his acting, but somehow it didn't. i try not to confuse the two things.
g
@genessa I sometimes feel that after reading the book the film can be a disappointment. I saw a film some time ago entitled "under the skin" starring Scarlett Johansen, who I adore. The film was set in Scotland which was of interest but it was low key and just OK. I recently read the book which was like a different story and really good.. I read "into the wild " by Cheryl Strayed and it was a great story. The film was ok but a bit disappointing.
@Moravian that is generally true, partly because books do a different thing to the brain than films do. i can think of an exception though: sophie's choice. the film was far superior to the book because styron decided to devote whole chapters to stingo's sex life and they were irrelevant to the story, but someone must have said "this will never sell; throw some sex in." the filmmakers wisely decided to leave those chapters out.
g
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Related Groups More
Ethical Sluts
429 members
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.