Scientists need to read the last line of this article. [msn.com]
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
1 comment
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.Why?
Stephanie99
Level 8
Feb 20, 2019
0
They're disputing that these fish could be a warning of impending danger without proof. Animals feel an earthquake coming on before humans do. Same principle?
@IAJO163 Generally scientists want proof of things before they believe them. That article isn't proof.
@Stephanie99 My proof was the last earthquake I was in the wildlife suddenly went quiet. It was only seconds later that I was seeking a doorway because everything was shaking violently. Instead of disputing it they should look into it.
@IAJO163 It would be nice to have more money for scientific research. If you do a search you will find that there are some examples. I listed a few:
[agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com]
[en.cnki.com.cn]
[pdfs.semanticscholar.org]
[sheldrake.org]
[journalofnaturalproducts.com]
@Stephanie99 Thanks, I'll check them out.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.