In order to minimize the terrible suffering of the Venezuelan people it is time to eliminate the present socialist gangster leadership using any means necessary, including the military option.
the USA has a great history of "helping" countries in central and south America hasn't it ?.
Yes. We smoked out the rotten communists.
I am puzzled why we're not doing airlifted care packages and lifting the Embargo which would allow Goods into Venezuela.
The socialist government would use air defense to shoot down the planes.
@zesty evidently they do have capable air defense systems. The answer then is still with the sanctions. Oh dear that would give Madura credit for feeding the people and then we wouldn't get our preferred person in charge. In other words it's not really about feeding the people.[militarywatchmagazine.com]
If the US were interested in "minimizing" the suffering of the Venezuelan people, don't you think they would have refrained from placing economic sanctions on the country? [state.gov]
If the US and its allies was interested in "minimizing" the suffering of the Venezuelan people, don't you think they would have returned to Venezuela what is rightfully Venezuela's? [bullionstar.com]
So let the kids starve, the women suffer, in general the citizens suffer, all because the idiots in Washington want the GOD in Venezuela . . . . The GOLD, the OIL and the DRUGS.
The USA:
.
interfered in Iraq - there is a war there now.
interfered in Syria - there is a war there now.
interfered in Libya - there is a war there now.
interfered in Yemen - there is a war there now.
interfered in Ukraine - there is a war there now.
interfered in Somalia - there is a war there now.
interfered in Afghanistan - there is a war there now.
.
No pattern of behavior here at all, right?
Look what they did to Libya . . . . Bombed the water supply in Libya, a clear and unambiguous war crime. [humanrightsinvestigations.org]
In fact, the pattern of behavior is so fixed that it can be outlined:
To some extent I agree. We need to modify our laws. Instead of economic sanctions we could just eliminate brutal dictators and just a few dozen or hundreds of leaders.
When was the last time you saw the leaders of Venezuela, Iran, Russia, North Korea, Syria, etc. invade, bomb, drone, use white phosphorous and depleted uranium on another country, and use military force to try to dictate to them how they should run their country?
The only "brutal dictators" are the ones in Washington.
And you mean to say what? That is not what I would call a very coherent question.
Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but since World War II, the good US of A has invaded, bombed, murdered far more countries and peoples than any other country in the world. The military of the United States is deployed in more than 150 countries around the world . . . [en.wikipedia.org] So if you want to start blaming countries and communism, you are arguing a seriously lost cause. If capitalism is so great, they would not need to use FORCE to get countries to adopt it.
How many times are people going to fall for this type of narrative? Memories must be very short. Just think oil.
Look at the Soviet, Chinese, North korean and Cuban success story!
He never expected to be elected, he was a foil for repukes to use, he never got the vote of the American people, he wouldn't have gotten what he did with out every repuke's lie cheat and steal. He's not a duly elected anything, the 16 election should be completely voided by congress, resending all decisions, orders and appointments.