The Surpreme Court rules that no one has been crucified on that particular cross so it does not count or something like that.

Take that down! What does it mean? Suppose that Jesus was electrocuted and the emblem was then an electric chair. No, I'm not making fun. I'm making sense. What does this mean?

As Animal Farm notes and Trump/GOP demand, some pigs are more equal than others

Well, they blew it, anyway. NPR reported that they found in favor of letting it remain.

I believe that ANY religious icon or word needs to be removed from any public land. Our (USA) government, and any land owned or managed by our government, has absolutely NO business displaying anything of a religious nature. I have mixed feelings about things of historical value, but still, at no point in this nation's development should any religious items have been displayed or condoned. There are myriad other manners in which we could honor whatever is being remembered, a christian cross should never have been erected in the first place. Anywhere!

As a person not an American I find it funny that America would erase the symbols of black oppression by removing monuments that symbolize the people that want to retain slavery namely in the American South during the American Civil war but would not erase the symbols that show the grab to power of groups of people who want to plaster people in their faces with their religious beliefs even though they are violating both civil and moral rights. Has America and its government been taken over by fanatics and we should rather go to Theist China for global guidance? America seems to be a nation on continous decline while China seems to be moving from strength to strength. Hope I’m wrong on all counts.

It seems like a no-brainer but remember those (especially Kavanaugh) who are now on the court.

I honestly think there are members of the court that will try any workaround they can in order to keep the cross where it is, but cases just like this one have already established a strong separation of state and church.
This is a section of AHA's docket submitted to the supreme court on page 38 and a link to that docket is below.
The formatting issues copying the pdf could not be avoided.

The Court has been unanimous that government-sponsored endorsement of is unconstitutional when the endorsement is sectarian, and this mandate is absolute, even when coercion is present and the practice is longstanding.
I.A.1.Every Member of the Court to consider the question has agreed that a prominent sectarian government display violates the Establishment Clause. Every Justice in County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (89) joined an opinion citing a promi-nent Latin cross as an archetypal and “obvious” Estab-lishment Clause violation. Every Justice in Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette, 5 U.S. 753 (95) agreed that giving preferential access to a Latin cross on government property would violate the Establishment Clause. Every Justice in McCreary County v. ACLU, 545 U.S. 844 (05) agreed that a solo prominent government display of a sectarian ver-sion of the Ten Commandments would violate the Es-tablishment Clause. And in Salazar v. Buono, 559 U.S. 700 (), the plurality reaffirmed what was said by Justice Kennedy in Allegheny, that the permanent erection of a Latin cross on conspicuous government property violates the Establishment Clause. Justice Alito expressed doubt, moreover, that the Establish-ment Clause would forbid an official World War I cross on the National Mall. Id. at 728 (concurring). I.A.2.Justices of this Court have been unani-mous in recognizing the Latin cross as the preeminent symbol of Christianity. The Circuits have likewise been “ of the obvious” on this point, and have uni-formly found freestanding government cross monu-ments unconstitutional on the grounds that they exalt Christianity.

[supremecourt.gov]

They will without a doubt rule in favor of keeping it.

The ruling class is not millionaires and billionaires. The ruling class are the endless amounts of useless middle managers, like the supreme court and other agencies and courts, senate and congress. They constantly rule in their own favor, vote themselves more power and trample on anyone they can get away with trampling on.

Now look where we are.

It's be interesting to see how it plays out.

Is there a law saying that the cross must be there? If not, then I’m fine with it. There’s much better things to worry about.

[baltimoresun.com]

A COUPLE MORE ARTICLES ON THIS ISSUE.

[deseretnews.com]

iT WILL BE very interesting to see how this vote goes.

Removing christian symbols like that one is a sin. Maybe that's the reason god punished our country, sending upon us two horrible plagues: Trump and Pence.