Yes. one of my pillars of disbelief. if religion were truly tenets by or rules from a deity, especially an omnipotent, omniscient deity, it would not have been introduced to what amounts to less than 2% of the earth's inhabitable crust and those indigenous to that crust. all religion is regional. religion if true (not a man made myth, spread by man,) would have certainly developed globally, no - universally, or the omniscient - isn't.
at least logically it makes sense to me for something that knows everything, the most practical choice for spreading the word it is not talking to one dude at a burning bush. or living and dying for my sins in jerusalem, from 0-30 something a.d. when i live in china, 0-30 something a.d. you're going to miss me when you cast that net. and you missed my chinese great, great, great, great, etc., pop-pop the eons prior with your flaming bush. i know, i know, mysterious ways... by the way, missed me again.
It is a known psychological fact that children accept the reality they are born in to, it is only later and by informed contemplation that they make changes to their minds, though a majority do not, because thinking takes too much effort and it is easier to simply conform.
In most cases I can agree. You are unlikely to find a Pentecostal living in Iran who was also born in Iran. When some people wake up they determine accurately that gods are myths. Others just keep on trying to believe by changing the background information. This last one is the true insanity of religion. I've had others tell me that I could not have tried all the religions. Why would I have to? This is proof that they never stopped believing.
Totally agree. When I left Christian fundamentalism I naturally took a look at alternative religions, but they all had the same failed epistemology of religious faith, which was the impetus for my rejection of my faith of birth.There is no sense changing a few details and leaving the main problem in place. If you correctly identify the core problem (assertions about gods are inherently non-falsifiable and cannot be substantiated) then you are organically led, not to other religions, but to agnosticism and then because you have no knowledge claim you come organically to atheism.
It is the tendency, especially since the late 19th century when colonizers mostly stopped trying to inflict their religions on the conquered peoples.
It is one more reason but there are conquered lands where invaders' religion has not made much difference like in India. It has been one of the most invaded lands in history (by Arabs, Persians,Greeks, Mongols, Mughals, Portuguese, French, Spanish and the British) but 86% of India is still Hindu today.
@Tiramisu India as a state yes, but not the sub-continent, several big chunks are islamic.
@Fernapple Correct but Islamization of India started not with invaders but the merchants that came to buy spices to trade on the spice route. Also the comment that we are replying to is not referring to sub-continents. It is talking regions.The Indus valley was a religion and India was the biggest chunk.
@Tiramisu Yes agree.