Agnostic.com

11 4

On Ethical Sluts, I posted a very misleading, confusing, and frankly, when read a certain way, insulting spiel about the "men" who dislike, even hate, sluts, defined in this honorable and respectful space, as proudly promiscuous women who love sex in all its forms and modes of expression, and don't care who knows it! I honor and respect these women, in fact view them as a vanguard of, we all hope sincerely, a redefinition, a paradigm shift, in "society's" very fundamental, basic attitude of what's "appropriate,"" "okay," "acceptable" behaviour by women in the sexual realm. I appeared to mock that behaviour by depicting sluts as strutting around with their tits hanging out, having sex with everything but the furniture, etc., etc. Now, first of all, iF I, personally, were a beautiful woman with a sexy, alluring body (and I often WISH it were the case for a host of reasons) or ANY woman for that matter, I would be having lots of sex, if I wished it, in other words, be a slut, and be loving it! Second of all, the post, to some, appeared to criticize sluts for their socially-unacceptable and even embarassing "carryings on!" Well, I personally wouldn't mind AT ALL if women were, and in some cases are (Mardi Gras) more open about their sexuality. In appropriate venues (micro bikinis on the beach) they already display their attributes to admirably STUNNING effect, in a proudly goddess-like assertion of their right to act ANY WAY THEY SO WISH. They behave in the more private sphere independently as well, taking on as lovers men OR women as they desire, any WAY they desire, in a refreshingly free and uninhibited way, "society" be da*ned! One can only stand and applaud. Here are true and glorious sluts, asserting their rightful place at the center, ARE the very CORE, of a truly just and equitable world. They, along with fair and noble men, are the BEST society can offer. If some men can't SEE that, well, frankly, that's THEIR problem. And THOSE were the cretins I was TRYING to depict: jealous, narrow-minded, sometimes Bible-thumping LOSERS who pretend they speak for the majority. Unfortunately, because so many people refuse to VOTE, such cretins have an out-sized role to play in public life, have assumed positions of power they do not deserve, if the true sentiments of the majority of the populace made themselves heard. They stand there in public forums and try to SHAME these liberated, emancipated women as if they have something to be ashamed about, when quite the opposite is true. So allow me to apologize if I gave anybody the impression I was endorsing these backward and ridiculous men who also, of course, are the very same Neandethrals who want us to believe dinosaurs and men coexisted in the "Garden of Eden," "God" created the universe in seven earth-days, Moses and Jesus really were historical figures who performed miracles, and so on and so forth. Sluts, I meant to shame THEM, not you, and if I gave any other impression I am very, deeply, sorry.

Storm1752 8 Mar 17
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

11 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Slut, whore, tramp, cunt, bitch. Just sayin'.

0

although i think all words should be spoken without admonition, i do not like any words used in ways to demean women who have lots of fun.

Nice long paragraph though.

Yeah I didn't mean it that way. I hope that's understood.

I have nothing but respect for women. I just wish there was some word other than "slut," which is the one they use. So until further notice I'LL use it. Alternative? It's not catchy, but like "boheme." Maybe there's a better one out there somewhere. Haven't come across it yet.

@Storm1752 I got that. I understand how misinterpretation is in the mind of the beholder. Too many people infer rather than attempt to comprehend.

"What you really mean is....."

It's only demeaning if you make it so.

@Wildflower It's only demeaning if one TAKES offense, or FEELS offended.
Sticks and stones,...

@Jacar You don't like words that demean women? What word in this post demeans women? Who's throwing sticks or stones?

@Wildflower responding to your comment about used to demean.
And the "sticks" bit is a general comment.

@Jacar I responded to your comment about words that demean women. I don't know where the sticks and stones came from. Why did you say sticks and stones?

@Wildflower sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.

2

How about we just get rid of the word “slut” all together. I just refer to them as women who like men and enjoy sex. Or, if you happen to be bi or gay and it applies to you, you could just as easily refer to them as women who like other women and enjoy sex.... or women who like both genders and enjoy sex.

Women who like men and enjoy sex hold a very special place as far as I’m concerned. I’ve enjoyed some very pleasurable experiences with some of them. And if they are equally as talented in the board room as they are in the bedroom, it’s even more of a turn on.

Nothing gets me hotter more than meeting a woman at a bar who is coming from her office job after a long day at work to meet a guy to help make her evening memorable.

I did say that. And in another post, I said almost every woman I ever dated was bi or had bi tendencies/fantasies/curiosities. I'm sure that has more to do with me and the "liberal element" with whom I associated, but, still, I DO happen to believe sluts are sympathetic to this orientation more than women who are not so awake to their own true natures. I'm perhaps biased by my own prurient proclivities. That said, I think it's arguable it is the natural order of things, and not just from a sexual point of view. Yes, some women throw other women under the bus, but I hold that's because the "system" artificially puts them at odds with one another, when they are in competition for the attention of rich, powerful men. As second-class citizens cut off from real power themselves, some feel they have no choice. Still, they form maternal bonds with their mothers, family, other women, and certain select men, much more easily than do men. Their support systems are much stronger and extensive. So, they are much more likely to bond in every way. That's my opinion, but I think not one without merit.

@MissKathleen

True. But the subject in this particular thread is about women. Also, I’m a heterosexual male, so for me I tend to focus on only women when it comes to sex.

“People” works just fine though.

@MissKathleen Just your statement right there is single-minded.

0

Too many commas...damn! I knew there had to SOMETHING wrong with it! Henceforth, fewer commas. AND, I thought the reference to "micro bikinis" might raise a few eyebrows, but after much soul-searching I decided you sluts would understand, and besides it was just too pleasant of vision to leave out.

Then, after MORE soul-searching, I decided, "What, am I high, sluts practically INVENTED them, and are the only women the known Universe who would actually wear them." If anyone actually DOES.

2

Seems if you upset a group you might post there - so they all hear the apology. Just sayin'.

You're right. I was half asleep. Hopefully it'll reach the right eyes anyway.

@Storm1752 you can always copy and paste.

4

Did not read the original post so I have no reference point but in high school a couple of girls were talking in the girls bathroom, I was in a stall taking a leak, they were discussing what makes a girl a slut, giving BJ's made you a slut was their consensus. This is like 9th grade. By the time I was giving BJ's (and lovin' it) I always wondered why they thought that made you a slut. smh
I have always done what I want with who I want. I love Mae West. Until the world sees women and men as equals in that regard women will get labeled badly for daring to enjoy sex as much as men.
Thing is it isn't just men labeling women sluts - women will kick their sisters to the curb.

Yes, but I didn't want to muddy the issue by pointing out SOMEBODY has to fuk them asholes to make baby as*holes. Sluts are a step forward in the progression of mankind into the light. Let's not forget, with few exceptions sluts were a persecuted minority until very recently. Even today, they are an exclusive minority, serving as a shining example few women dare to emulate. This is because the patriarchy is alive and well, criminal sexual predators are still on the prowl, and even enlightened men sometimes have difficulty dealing with it. It will take time before recombinant DNA applications, social engineering, or something, weeds out/corrects this problem

@Storm1752 There's always genetic engineering 😉. lol

@silverotter11 Isn't that recombinant DNA? I'm no scientist.

7

par·a·graph
noun

  1. a distinct section of a piece of writing, usually dealing with a single theme and indicated by a new line, indentation, or numbering.
    "the concluding paragraph"
4

Just remember... A slut fucks everybody! A Bitch fucks everybody except you!

Correction: not EVERYBODY. Just cool guys like you and I. Sluts are selective and VERY discriminating.

2

Thank you so much for clarifying your post which was very confusing. We ("Ethical Sluts") appreciate your apology.

As a former journalist, I am embarassed by my failure to edit/proofread properly, leading to a careless and slipshod use of the language, and as a newbie newly appreciative of its importance.

2

Are points given for the most words used? IDK.

5

The best definition of a slut that I have heard, is a woman who loves sex as much as a man. Given our society has produced people who need a god figure to be good or justify what they do this fits very well. A woman should not have to have tag to do what she wants.

BillF Level 7 Mar 17, 2019

Why do you assume that all men love sex more than women? If you support women who want to have lots of sex then you also have to support men who don't.

@Happy_Killbot I recommend and support, you do you, I do me and strive to do or cause no harm.

Too bad Jesus didn't actually exist. According to the myth, he was married (?) to Mary Magalene, wasn't he? According to the myth, SHE was a slut herself, wasn't she? Oh but that's right, few if any rich men go to heaven, too. If Christian's would only READ their Bibles, none of this would be necessary. Then again, the Bible says a lot of absurd things, too. But you already know this.

...agree

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:312396
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.