I agree time doesn't exist; however the seeming existence of time, to me, is a construct of our human consciousness, which interprets aspects of reality as having beginning and endings, If you take a circle, it has no beginning or ending, but it can be interpreted segmented arcs. which are then seen, by the human mind as time-based.
There is no way of proving or disproving the existence of god, as we all know. It's only possible to logically demonstrate the non-logic in believing in god, especially a personal god, something I enjoy and find interesting. To me, nothing is more interesting than attempting to understand conscious existence.

Absolute correct. Also, consider in the christian god's mind, everyone that has been, is now, or ever will be, exists in his all-knowing mind. So, to me, logically, if the christian god creates with a free will and a diviner plan to follow, and he sends those of us who use our gifted free will to reject him, he sends us to hell. Is he not sending a part of himself to hell, when everyone has forever existed in his mind. Thus, how could there be the existence of a christian god having the capability of rejecting himself?

Right. Crazy things result from crazy interpretations. The trick is to interpret correctly, which, for each of us, is our subjective understanding of objective reality. I like what Shakespeare said :"Nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it so."

Interesting reply which I agree with, but when pointing out the inconsistencies within christianity, god must be assumed to be anthropomorphic because that's what christians believe god is. It always continues to amaze that seemingly intelligent individuals believe in a personal anthropomorphic god.

@Tomm
I understand your point, and essentially agree, but feel compelled to beg for a slight rephrasing, because clearly not all Christians make that assumption.

And I’m not just talking about the odd unknown outlier here but the likes of Spinoza or Hegel or a more recent iconic Christian, Paul Tillich who was often accused of being an atheist because of his apparently non-anthropomorphic descriptions of God. And the list is long.

It’s not just an obscure token idea in religious history, but one of the time honored perspectives that has existed since the beginning of rational thought, and is alive today in theologians such as Bart Ehrman and Karen Armstrong, and others. The late Joseph Campbell was quite famous for his depictions of and respect for non-literal representations of religious symbology, and so on.

I would say it’s not always easy to know for sure, from the outside of a person’s skull, whether their words refer to a personification of a concept or a literal interpretation of a symbol, because they themselves may not have found it necessary to make that distinction consciously.

And I would make the case that, in some sense, it may not make much difference, because no matter how we envision the totality of forces in the universe that are beyond our control, they inarguably do exist. They did create us, and we will be enfolded back into them when we die. We can complain about the unfairness of it if we wish, but a refusal to believe it doesn’t make it go away.

It’s just not historically accurate to speak of religious literalists as if they represent the entirety, or even the most important component of religious tradition, even if they might admittedly comprise a majority.

We all agree that the idea of a infinite personal god punishing individuals for exercising the free will that god implanted within everyone, is absurdly ridiculous. This idea also occurred to me: if an infinite god is all-knowing, he knows which of his creations would go to heaven or hell. So, why didn't an infinite all-knowing god only create individuals whom he knew would accept his divine plan? .

Difficult to keep their stories straight when it's all a LIE.....

Here's the way I see it logically (if christianity has any validity). Everyone that god so-called created existed in his mind before being created, be cause he's all-knowing. Thus, created man is an extension of himself, and in that sense we are all an individualization of god.

This is what I've noticed as well. The Christian God has all the traits of an abuser but on a grand scale. And yet you're required to worship him or be damned. Give me damnation, I say.