According to just released 2018 data from the General Social Survey, “Nones” are now the largest single “religious” demographic in the country (23.1%), statistically tied with Catholics (23.0%) and just above evangelical Christians (22.5%).
Read the rest by clicking the link below.
[friendlyatheist.patheos.com]
American Atheists put using religion in reference to atheists nicely in regards to the first amendment and I will post their comment below. Also, the term religion is often used in reference to atheists for the purpose of demographics, and civil rights. I'm not at all sure why that's a big deal to some. However, comparing atheism to religion for the purpose of showing a similarity of belief systems is easily shown as faulty and doesn't need the alarmist view of many that are confronted with that assertion.
From American Atheist with the link below.
Atheism is not a religion, but it does “take[] a position on religion, the existence and importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics.”6 For that reason, it qualifies as a religion for the purpose of First Amendment protection, despite the fact that in common usage atheism would be considered the absence, rejection, or opposite of religion. Put another way, discrimination on the basis of religious belief extends to all beliefs about religion.
[atheists.org]
@Antifred Um, wow. Alright.
Leadership is the devil. Laws are the beast, and taxes are the mark of the beast. Got it.
Thanks for playing. Different meds might help but it's time to move along now.
"Nones" aren't a religion and it's also misleading compared to the overall number of religious people to portray it that way.
And yet nones hold a religious stance, to not associate or practice in any religion.
Considering all the religions out there I consider it a profound view of theology even if the word itself (none) gives the vague impression of not committing to a theistic position. The growing number of people not wanting to participate in organized religion is very encouraging in my view.
@AtheistNews That's like saying someone who comments on pedophiles has a "pedophile stance" and therefore is a pedophile.
@Piece2YourPuzzle lol. No it isn't.
Having a pro or con stance on pedophiles does not make someone a pedophile in of itself and you know it. Oversimplifing it to that extent is juvenile and inaccurate.
The same goes with having a view on religion. It doesn't make one religious but it also doesn't take away their perspective about religion.
It sounds like you are saying that when a poll investigates a communities religious beliefs people without religion should be left out. That's nonsense. Atheists have believes about religion just like theists do. Believing in one less religion than a theist is still a stance or view about religion. Having that stance doesn't make me religious just like my views on pedophilia don't make me a pedophile. But just because I'm not a pedophile it doesn't make my views on that subject insignificant. The same goes for my views on theology. They are not insignificant just because I don't believe in one.
@AtheistNews I'm not saying anyone should be left our of the poll. I think there might be some confusion here. I want to make it clear that we both agree that "nones" aren't religious, or did you think they were? If you think they are then what I said stands. It seemed to me that you thought they were, but then said they weren't, and then said they were. I want to be clear. Either way, I still don't think atheists "believe" in one less religion.
We don't worship an imaginary deity. How can we be "religious". I haven't built an alter to science books or Dawkins. Our thought are own and not buried in dogma.
The term is often used because even an atheist has a view about religion (not believing). Because of that religious view atheists do have a religious stance and demographic.
I would like to see that "none" category explained more fully. Not being part of an organized religion doesn't necessarily mean 'non-belief' or 'no religion'. Many people remain 'spiritual' and lead a 'faith-based' life. Just curious how many people openly call themselves agnostic/atheist here in the U.S. Regardless of that question, I do find the trend reassuring. Now we need to do more to get a more secular government with more secular representatives in public office.
A none is someone that doesn't associate with any religion or church. Spiritual people are often still nones if they don't back some specific theology.
@SeaGreenEyez Yes, my inner skeptic doubted that it could really be true. Maybe someday...probably not in my lifetime. I agree that calling us 'irreligious' sounds like 'heretic' to me! ha Oh well. At least I know that when a demographic study comes out that shows more detailed and current information about this subject matter, I'll find it on this site before any other one.
@SeaGreenEyez There are a couple of encouraging things. One is the fact that the nones are unwilling to own up to any association with any church or organized religion and that that trend is growing. It may not go hand in hand that leaving the church will make people less superstitious but it's a start.
Also, the numbers are just now starting to climb significantly so my hope is politicly their influence will be greater than churches before long. The influence of churches over politics should drop as their numbers diminish and the nones irregardless (had to fit that word in somehow) if they still believe in supernatural things are a step away from stronger churches.
This correlates to what I experience. Most of the people I know are non-religious.