Given that life in itself is meaningless, what do we have in mind when we talk about the "meaning of life"? Is it something we invent on the spot and discard it later if something new comes along, when a new situation appears? Or is it something more stable, something that transcends the here and now, the whims and moods of the moment?
Is there a structure that all our personal meanings of life have in common?
The following pattern comes to my mind: The naked, isolated "me" certainly is meaningless, until the "me" is linked to something larger: the family, my friends, my job, my country, the political cause I am engaged in, or even a supernatural order into which I can tap to receive a purpose "from above", aka "religion".
The common pattern is that meaning always comes from the outside. It is a common misconception that the meaning of life can come from within. Everything that is "inside" has its origins in the outside, without it, the "inside" is void and non-existent. We have to latch onto something other, something larger to fill this inner void, to have an "I" in the first place.
An interesting point but the Vedic scholar would argue that internal activity of mind creates externalisation, thereby the perception of Other. Whatever ‘other’ that may be is a projection of our internal world, both individually and collectively.
As usual, a faulty premise
No the premise is sound.
Meaning is what humans impose on their world to help them cope.
Life in itself is meaningless, we have to give it meaning through knowledge and experience.
@chazwin sorry, I disagree. we know what life is in all of its different forms and we don't have to give it any meaning, it's just life. otherwise all I have to say is the question is meaningless and nobody has to answer it. If you looked at a slide under a microscope and on the slide you saw something moving, you could call it life and by itself it has meaning then, because life in and of itself has meaning or you wouldn't know what the definition of life was.
@Matias I guess you may see that as a way to justify your wrongful premise and that's fine. Or you missed my point. Your premise is at life itself is meaningless and the fact that it is life obviously isn't meaningless. I'm also guessing that people that are struggling with their lives love to hear people tell them that life is meaningless. Wouldn't drive anyone to suicide would it?