French philosopher Jean-Pierre Faye was the first to describe the horseshoe theory, the concept that political orientation forms more of a horseshoe than a continuum, with the extreme Right and extreme Left nearly touching in the middle. On the extreme Right you have authoritarianism (where the dominant male has total power) and on the extreme Left totalitarianism (where the state has total power), both of which bear striking resemblance to one another.
Interesting. Conversely broad-minded genuine conservatives and broad-minded genuine liberals are not at loggerheads. In fact, a person can be both liberal and conservative at the same time.
The same pattern can be seen in other areas. For example, an extreme hater of religion who has a dogmatic materialist philosophy is little different than an extreme religious fundamentalist. Yet open minded atheists and open-minded religious people often get along well and find common ground.
Maybe instead of emphasizing our differences of opinion we should emphasize our degree of awareness and appreciation for the profound miracle of existence and our love and respect for our fellow beings.
@Matias Libertarians are liberal about personal freedoms such as a woman’s freedom to choose an abortion and the freedom to use drugs. They have conservative values when it comes to economics, but I’m sure you already knew that. Jimmy Carter, when he was running for president, described himself as liberal on social issues and conservative on financial matters.
I think being liberal or conservative means having certain personal traits. To be liberal is to love, respect and honor all your fellow humans—it’s not just to be in favor of programs that have been labeled as “liberal”. To be conservative is to be optimistic, to value the world the way it is and to respect tradition. Though liberals and conservatives might disagree on issues, there is no reason a person can’t have both liberal and conservative characteristics at the same time.
Maybe the true dichotomy is not left vs right but it is between radicalism and broad mindedness. Ego driven zealots are convinced that they have the true and correct solution for the problems of society, and they’ll do almost anything to promote their agendas. It doesn’t matter what they are pushing, whether left or right they’re all the same and their opinions are generally worthless. At the other end of the spectrum are leaders like Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter who tried to find consensus and promote harmony.
IMO horseshoe theory is severely oversimplified because it assumes that as liberal ideologies become more extreme they lean towards authoritarianism, when in reality we see extreme libertarianism coupled with left (anarchism) and right (anarcho-capitalism) ideologies, and that would make the shape more of an hourglass.
It also only assumes only two axis, economic left-right and governance libertarianism authoritarianism. You could very easily throw in culture (individualist-collectivist), or progressivism ( traditional-progressive). In fact, without some of these dimensions certain political ideologies become difficult to map, for example fascism which is very authoritarian but is neither left nor right economically, so a line at the authoritarian end of the graph could represent a fascist regime.
The 8 political values is becoming more popular but has the same problems as the other methods used in political science. [8values.github.io]