Lawrence Krauss The story of protons, electrons ...Higgs fields are the building blocks of life. He makes the case for the beginning of life and the small roll humans play in the continuation of life. When we don't understand we can fill in the gaps with god. Knowledge is the key. Ironically his book is called The Greatest Story Ever Told, so Far. [books.google.com]
It's one thing for some of us (apparently not all based on some of these comments) to be scientifically curious about our origins and source. That's a personal journey, or one for small groups of similar thinking folks. But it's quite another to attempt to change society or laws based on "Faith". Faith is important to the small minded prisoner, who would be a murderer among us if he did not have faith. But our larger supported social organisms (governments and politicians) should remember to leave their imaginary friends out of our lives. I'm gong to give myself an Amen. Whatever that means...
I think the problem is not with faith but with insisting that God's Kingdom be instituted before its time by human beings, according to their prejudices. A real Christian would wait for that kingdom and live quietly and decently in the meantime.
Science is not afraid of the unknown and even better, science is never afraid or even embarrased to say "I don't know".
I think that's a myth. I believe science is as dogmatic as religion and forces its members to toe the line about its belief system.
@brentan True science isn't dogmatic, and it isn't a belief system. It is a process for discovery, and by its' very design can't be dogmatic. Puedo-science on the other hand, is dogmatic because you are starting with the conclusion and proving it with baseless claims.
Science is not a belief system.
@Mofo1953, @Happy_Killbot Science is a belief system ever since Descartes decided everything in the universe is materialistic including the human mind. Try going against that nonsense and nobody in science will work with you.
@brentan Descartes is revered for his work in mathematics more so than his philosophies. In particular, laying the foundation of Cartesian coordinates and his work in geometry.
A lot of his philosophical work such as dualism is what laid the foundation for many prominent modern pseudo-scientific "discoveries" such as the pineal gland somehow connecting to or containing the soul. No credible scientist and no credible science suggests this.
If you are a scientist and you don't go against that nonsense, nobody in science will work with you.
The materialist philosophy was created in direct opposition to Descartes work. It was primerely developed by Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi. In modern times this philosophy is considered largely outdated, with physicalism being the focus.
If we had any evidence for dualism ( there is none ) and no evidence or falsification for physicism ( never been falsified ) then it would be scientific to conclude that dualism was probably true. Scientists are largely materialists or physicalists as a result of following science, they don't start with those worldviews.
@brentan Au contraire, mon ami, Rene Descartes in his Discourse on the Method, lays out a framework for “rightly conducting one's reason and of seeking truth in the sciences.” It’s not a description of the scientific method of hypotheses and experimentation. Instead, it’s a practical philosophy about how to seek truth, there is only one truth, the one backed by facts, ergo, not the belief system you so baselessly espouse.
@brentan ,
particularly applies to the global warming scam.
@brentan still with your nonsense? Do not put words in my mouth, the word I used has also a secular meaning. Only a google away, see definition number 2, now stop with your idiocy.
Sacrilege noun
sac·ri·lege | \ ˈsa-krə-lij \
Definition of sacrilege
1 : a technical and not necessarily intrinsically outrageous violation (such as improper reception of a sacrament) of what is sacred because consecrated to God
2 : gross irreverence toward a hallowed person, place, or thing
I am comfortable with the unknown, and still amazed by what can be seen.