It is amazing. My views are not liberal. The second i post a linertarian opinion or response i get a humiliating, stupid, uneducated personal attack from liberals. They don't attack my point of views, just me. Oh, fuck you all, primitive socialists!
I hope you know that progressives are angry because Trump kicked their ass. They do not see what is wrong with them. They think it is all Trump's fault. Hillary hid 20,000 e-mails but it was her fault, she was not a natural leader but Trump acted illegally, Hillary was one of the poorest candidates we chose but she was better than Trump.... all this has made progressives bitter and often mean. This side of the platform has become mean, narrow minded that never sees both sides of the issue.
Trump was elected because of what Washington has become, people wanted Trump to break it. We put the Washington's animosity, hatred from democrats on display again in the Muller testimony yesterday. This is exactly what people do not like. People business is pending but democrats are filled with hatred and are full of political games. I think the voters are going to teach a bigger lesson to career politicians who have been playing these games and are not doing people's work. 2020 is coming. Trump will capitalize on it.
There are members who are unable to contribute to a constructive dialog, but are bitching about Trump every day. It is just one way. You cannot change it but you can stand your ground. Don't walk away, stick to who you are and what you want to say. There are many members who agree with you.
I can start your posts here if you would like = [agnostic.com]
Thank you!
What’s a “linertarian”?
Libertarian, sorry
@Haemish1 It is a very interesting question: geniuses of economics like Friedman and von Hayek made very accurate predictions in their field of expertise. At the same time the rate of the technological development very significantly increased. Do today's economic theories reflect this phenomenon?
@zesty
I think libertarian economics rest upon a false acceptance of “the free market.” A free market exists only in a primitive, barter economy.
My understanding of a free market is one of no rules or regulations. Without those things we get monopoly irrespective of technological change.
Reasonable regulations such as US policy from the end of the second world war, led to greater competition, more growth and a more equitable wealth distribution within our country.
Solution: Don't Post Dumbass Bullshit ! Problem solved .
These idiotic, primitive statements are the ones.
@zesty The worst system is the type in Spain, where voters can only vote for a party list of candidates.
Then, Depending of the proportion of votes each party receives, the names are selected from the list, starting at the top. Thus the top few names ALWAYS get a seat, irrespective of talent.
Furthermore, the lists are drawn up by the unseen "puppet masters" of each party. If a politician wants a seat in the house or senate, he'd better toe the line. Thus, unseen and unelected people actually decide the fates of the voters!
This is the last word in Patronage!!!!