Christopher Hitchens had slight variations on this over the years but this is a composite of my favorite sentences/points of his:
"Let's say fully evolved homo sapiens have been on the planet 100,000 years. Francis Collins thinks at least 100,000, Richard Dawkins thinks perhaps 250,000. I'll take 100,000. In order to be a Christian you have to believe that for the first 98,000 years, heaven watched with folded arms as people are born, likely dying in childbirth, or of microorganisms they don't know exist. Life expectancy for the first several 10s of 1,000s of years maybe 20-25. Dying in pointless turf wars. Dying in seemingly supernatural events like earthquakes, floods, typhoons, etc. But slowly and gradually advancing onwards as homo sapiens. For 98,000 years heaven watches that not caring. And then decides 2,000 years ago 'That's enough of that. It's time to intervene. Why don't we give God a son and murder him cruelly in an illiterate part of the middle east? Let's not appear to the Chinese who can read, write, do science and study evidence...no let's go to the desert and have another revelation there. That ought to solve it.'
You have to believe something like that in order to be a Christian. Well, I invite you to believe it, but I can't envy you."
Let the Lord Jesus in to your heart!
why?
So he can save you
Save me from what?
For the fucking up He and his followers will give you if you don't let him in!
LOL that's one of my other favorite memes
Catholicism accepts evolution so this scenario is more problematic to them. But, Evangelical, Fundamentalist, Conservative Christians insist that humans were created only six to ten thousand years ago--and closer to six. There are still a multitude of problems with their scenario, but they don't have this problem.
Well even in that scenario God spent thousands of years damning everyone and basically not giving a shit.
@LenHazell53 Yes, which is why I said that their scenario is also problematic. They just don't have as much time to account for. Nor do they have the problem of just when did humans get a "soul" as they think humans were created with it.
I often wonder about this. It is as if a historical Jesus is used to make a propitiatory sacrifice for something that happened in an allegory. Just recently, I'm hearing intimations from Christians that perhaps the resurrection is an allegory too. I think they must mean Christ's death really, if they want to claim the later allegorical event makes the propitiation for the earlier allegorical event.
@brentan Since most of the events of the gospels are plagiarized from elsewhere it is likely that someone once did arrange with his followers to drug him with a catalypsey inducing drug on the "Sponge on a stick" which the Romans would find very funny as sour wine soaked sponges on sticks were their version of toilet paper, they were literally making an arse of him.
They then take him down after paying a soldier to prod him with a spear instead of breaking his legs, and revive him afterward.
The same thing happened a few centuries later when the highwayman Jack Shepard was hanged, after being drugged to fake an quick death, he was then taken down, revived and spirited away to the USA.
@LenHazell53 That's humorous but adds nothing to the discussion.
@brentan It is not meant to be humorous, all I have stated is either historical fact or a reasonable inductive conclusion.
@LenHazell53 About some other topic.
Yes, that pretty well states it but Christians just don't think about it. You have to just believe. Otherwise it would be called "rational" instead of "faith".
The whole thing is ridiculous, once you can see past the end of your nose.