If it was fair assault rifles would be regulated too

@Bobsuruncle and have you counted how much of that tax is collected at gun shows? Last I checked PROHIBITION of buying something like sudafed is slightly different than a $200 tax.

@Bobsuruncle not collected at gun shows and "generally"... perfect regulation

@lerlo Its not really a prohabition, you just can't buy large amounts at once. It seems reasonable to me. Its highly abused and it's not neccesary to have bulk amounts for their legal intended use.

To be clear I think assult rifles and any other high power fast firing firearms should actually be prohibited. These are not necesarry for legal intended use to defend yourself from immediate danger or hunt.

@MsAl Unfortunately, having prosecuted drug cases for 5 years, you just go to enough stores and buy the quantity you need.

@Bobsuruncle I was just saing there is no prohibition on Sudafed because you seemed to be saying there is. Turns out I was responding to the wrong person that was @lerlo. I do appologize.

The second ammendment open for interpretation and certainly did not say anything about assult rifles. Its only interpreted the way it is because of massive amounts of fraudulent money going into the politics of it.

@lerlo yes but it makes it harder. Unfortunately the presription ones got overpromoted and pushed right in there to cause a whole similar problem just as big.