Agnostic.com

2 1

To argue a point or position without facts and reason to support it simply acknowledges the existence of what one argues against.

Soldier76 4 Nov 17
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Thanks for bringing this up. I am compiling a list of questions and one deals with irrational thinking and emotions versus knowledge. What I don't see but which is implied, is the force of experience. To me that one thing can make or break a discussion.

0

Not necessarily. It just demonstrates the debater hasn't thought through her/his aurgument.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:4059
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.