Most of the world now thinks religion is the cause of the world's problems! [usnews.com]
Unfortunate, since religion is merely a tool of control. The root of the evil is greed, the desire for more at any cost. When the Romans understood that religion and a fear of God was more cost effective than the standing armies at controlling the empire, we got the Vatican. But the evil did not originate with this church.
For a long time, the Romans actually permitted the people they conquered to retain whatever gods or practices they had held, in order to gain faster control over them. They'd insert a Roman official or two to run the place, but leave most things status quo, except for now paying Roman taxes. Things wouldn't be noticeably different until the taxes became overwhelmingly impossible to pay. Some smaller places were "conquered" just by the armies showing up at the gates, offering no resistance to Roman rule at all. Hey, they'd get running water and new roads! They often didn't see the downside.
Sort of the precursor to corporate takeovers today, maybe?
@LisaFultonave Very perceptive.
Oversimplification to say itβs just religion. Human traits of selfishness and greed are just as much to blame.
@Allamanda Yes...I already think that itβs the biggest contributor to wars and hatred of others...but was just adding that there are other factors which contribute...not disagreeing, but adding to the mix.
@ToolGuy I didnβt say everyone was greedy or selfish....but unfortunately a lot of people who influence events...i.e. politicians and others in position of power are greedy and selfish.
@ToolGuy I think if you care to look you said..and I quote you βpeople are not greedy and selfish β...that was why you disagreed with me. I still maintain that a large number are.
@ToolGuy You and I will fall out if you continue to misconstrue my words in such a way. I was replying to an item posted which states that people attribute todayβs problems to religion. I merely stated that it was over simplistic to blame it purely on religion and that there many other factors including the two I mentioned. You then chose to challenge me on that by stating β I disagree. People are not greedy and selfishβ. The fact that you then went on to state that these traits are not universal does not negate your earlier statement...especially in view of the fact that I hadnβt said that I thought everyone was, but that they were human traits...which they undoubtedly are.
@ToolGuy I donβt read anything in this article which refutes my assertion that greed and selfishness are human traits...whether acquired or genetic...itβs indisputable that certain humans display both.
@ToolGuy I never said an inborn trait...just a human one...we acquire many due to different factors during our lifetimes including environmental and circumstantial. In any case your article is inconclusive about the genetic bit ..so why are you even nitpicking my every word? And by the way I hate the way you capitalise certain words as if Iβd be too dim to get your meaning otherwise.
@ToolGuy. Itβs not a pet theory..but it is my opinion, of which Iβm entitled, so your reference to being an iconoclast is misplaced. What you were attacking was not a cherished theory, but merely my opinion, and what you were doing was being patronising not iconoclastic. What you think of my opinions is quite immaterial to me, you have your opinions on this matter which differ from mine and I believe yours are quite inconsistent and contradictory. However that is in my opinion and Iβm sure you disagree. Your opinion is valid to you, mine is valid to me, so touchΓ© my dear. You can give yourself any label you wish but please donβt ever put one on me and believe that you know anything about me or what I think, because you donβt.
@ToolGuy. Get a life!!
30% of the survey respondents thought that religion was the problem. That was the most popular choice, but that does not mean that most people think that religion is the problem. It's a misleading headline.
Religion will dwindle... But the fundamentalists will rise a little higher I would think. As they see people fleeing religion, some will want to double down on the big lie.
sort of, "My god tells me to love you. But if you don't believe in him, I must kill you!"
It reaches a point of complete and total contradiction in logic: a prime example being the βpro-lifeβ extremists. The ones who stalk clinic workers, and bomb clinics, and who truly donβt see a problem saying: βabortion is murder; if you donβt stop, weβll kill you allβ.
Only religion breeds crazy that strong.
I think most of the world thinks 'religions other than mine are the cause of the worlds problems' .... if they think at all
Politics and religion are often tied together.
I'm glad I'll probably be dead in 2050, if that's what we have to look forward to, but I'm hesitant to agree the number of non-religious will dwindle.
I DO agree Islam is a real and growing danger, another version of Naziism, and will be the cause of the next Big War, if we are stupid enough to fight one.
The sooner religion is stamped out, the better.
I think fundamentalist ANYTHING is a threat, including, to a comparatively miniscule degree, atheism.
Closemindedness is the real enemy.
@Allamanda I think they assume a zero-sum, one subtracted from one group is automatically added to the other. It's got to be a more dynamic process than that.
The overlooked variable, I think, is the magnitude of present-day problems and the utter uselessness of thousand-year-old solutions.
I'm optimistic people are waking up to that reality, and will face it before it's too late.
If true, the numbers will eventually reflect it. Besides, I think the numbers are skewed anyway.
I note that nationalism is not included in the list. surprising.
What a sad state of affairs.
Can we even speak of Jewish nationalism (Zionism) as it drives the wars for oil?
@ExculpatoryLover There are more atheists in Israel than almost anywhere else.
@ExculpatoryLover Zionism causes many problems but surely it is our profligate lifestyles that cause the wars over oil.
In the UK any benefits from running electric cars has been counteracted by the greater sale of gas guzzling SUVs
@Moravian ~ Our lifestyles do not drive wars, come on. Our lifestyles are choices made from the options available. Iraq was invaded because they broke the demand made by the United States, Israel and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to pay for all oil in Federal Reserve Notes only, the so called petro-dollar. Iraq began selling their oil for Euros, so we invaded them, shut off their oil supply for a few years, and reaped the profits. Shame on Bush, Clinton, all of the Warmongers and dual citizen Israelis in the US Congress, 89 of them all Democrats. SMH
@Moravian ~ Electric cars are a sham, they use electric generated by what? Burning of coal? Nuclear fission and all that toxic waste? Did you know it takes more energy to manufacture one of those giant windmills than all the energy it will capture while running for years until it breaks down? We need the free energy developed by Nikola Tesla, zero point energy which is limitless and clean.
@ExculpatoryLover
[theguardian.com]
You been watching Fox news again ?
I have never heard of this amazing free Tesla energy. Could you give me a link to some data on it.
@Moravian ~ I never watch FoxNews, it is as bullshit as the rest of the Wall Street Media of lies and propaganda. I do not even watch any television programming, no time for it. Funny how people never heard of Tesla or how he devised the modern world basically through his ideas. Electricity is everywhere throughout the Universe, in every living thing, all one needs to do is understand it. Electrical engineering is the key to the Cosmos.
@ExculpatoryLover I was making an oblique reference to your erroneous comment about wind turbines,
I think everyone knows about Nikola Tesla, hence the current joke. If you steal a Tesla car does it become an Edison.
@Moravian ~ Well, earth scientist David Hughes stated those mega windmills are quite problematic, but I am sure some idiot of FauxNews used his words out of context. Total costs include maintenance of the machines as well, the fact they need to be stopped and secured during high winds, etc. Stupid idea, unless we used small efficient windmills directly at the point the power is needed. These wind farms are a waste, pumping the electric through miles of wires reduces half the power or more through resistance and impedance. They want wind farms to retain the style of business the power industry has become. SMH.
@Moravian ~ Best, most efficient windmills in the world = www.windside.com
Well that plus overpopulation (arguably caused by religions), greed, money, and power.
I knew this 20 years ago. Religion poison's everything it touches.
the point is not that religion poisons society, which we all know. it's that supposedly most of the world thinks so. i don't think most of the world is that self-aware.
g
As much as I oppose religion, I disagree. Greed and arrogance are the cause. Religion is merely a useful tool for corrupt and greedy leaders to convince their followers to do their bidding.
I partially concur. Yet as Lloyd Blankfein CEO Goldman Sachs once stated: "I'm doing 'God's Work."
It is that many of company leaders, lawyers, politicians, etc are sociopaths, narcissists or psychopaths.
Yup. I got that notion strongly imprinted in my mind the days weeks months and years after 9/11. Before that I looked at religion as harmless. After, I look at it as a lethal zombifying memetic virus.
The trouble is all this was written in books, coded in various movies in the 70's 80's and 90's, in the news, showing how religion "takes over" a person or people, and ruins lives.
But it just never truly made me conciously aware of our existential dangers until 9/11. My family isn't religious, so it's was the feeling of "that's not us, won't happen to us".
The trouble with growing up with good kind common-sensical secular people is you think everyone is like that. No one could possible believe in the absurd nonsense, and the number of people who do must be tiny fraction.
Nope. How naive and wrong I was.
Amen!
No doubt religion will double down and do their unholy best to bring us to destruction. In the end they are all death cults and very dangerous.
Who in pluperfect hell is limiting the spectrum of debate here? Life is the cause of the worldβs problems.
I often say "The leading cause of death is life"
@Storm1752 No name calling necessary. He is just having some fun.
And I thought the problem was time.
@PondartIncbendog Yeah, with enough time, life can do a lot.
I really don't think the root cause is religion as much as greed, extreme individualism, tribalism, fear of differences in others and, most importantly, governments run by the rich, corporations, and corrupt politicians. The world could be rid of religion and these other problems would still lead to things being very fucked up.
I sort of like extreme individualism.
@BryanLV It is not healthy for societies. Go live on your own island, if you can afford one. Most Libertarians seem to desire that, except for their desire to benefit from police, fire depts, roads, and other benefits from living in societies they don't want to pay taxes for.......
But who will build the roads?
Classic.
Nothing divides, separates, segregates, discriminates, and teaches hate of others.... Like Religion does!
We will never be a better people until the archaic beliefs of our forbears are finally removed as any kind of mainstream idealism....
Simple as that...
Not so sure it is that simple. Take the religion away and you still are left with the same humans, aren't you ? I believe the root of the problem is to be looked for in the human heart. I believe also that the greatest man or woman this world has ever known were carried by a deep belief in what religion is supposed to stand for at its very core. Behind religion is something much greater and universal: spirituality.
I can agree but also causes mental disorders in some people as well.
Religion make me crazier than hell!
The article sources this
A ranking of nations from best to worst using 21,000 people
[usnews.com]
From there
"Data Source: About the Survey
Survey participants were given a random subset of countries and country attributes to consider. The combinations were presented in a grid form where participants were prompted to check off the characteristics they associated with each country. If a participant indicated that they were not familiar with a country, it was removed from their survey.
Each participant considered about half of the country attributes for about a third of the countries. In this way, each attribute and country pair was reviewed at least 270 times by each of the three types of survey participants in each of the four regions. The more times an attribute-country pair was checked off in the grid, the higher the attribute score was for that country.
In addition to considering countries in terms of attributes, each survey participant was asked to respond to a set of questions that gauge perceptions of the state of the world today on a variety of topics including the economy, politics, leadership and technology.
A set of standard demographic questions helped to screen for global diversity and equal weight among participant groups."
"In a recent Best Countries survey of more than 21,000 people from all regions of the world, the majority of respondents identified religion as the "primary source of most global conflict today."
This results in a graph which shows 30% of the population thinking religion the main problem in any given nation, 23% thinking Power, 21% think economy, and so on.
So I think its a provocative title as the data does not truly support the term most, and I am very disappointed the US N&WR did so. MOST tends to make people think 70-90% of all people, NOT religion was ranked worst aspect at 30%.
@Allamanda Makes me want to dig in that data (which is not availible), because of this
"Survey participants were given a random subset of countries and country attributes to consider. The combinations were presented in a grid form where participants were prompted to check off the characteristics they associated with each country."
So IF your grid was the mideast would not most Americans, Brits and Europeans list religion as a MAIN cause?
I would prefer to have those details broken down, are you asking circular culture or square culture? Are you using the same question, which might not carry the same meaning?
Polling is all about how you frame your question.
If I want to make a poll on abortion I can easily skew the result by framing the question.
Are you pro abortion?--Will net a high percentage of NO
Are you Pro Fetus?--Will get a high yes percentage
And so on, HOW the questions were written is rarely shared, only the results. So I take all polls with a very large grain of salt, it is far too easy to twist the numbers via language.
well, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
You mean following an invisible entity who didn't even write the book the religasheep follow is causing problems? Well,,,,that's hard to believe.