Update: some sites for co-parenting - modamily.com and familybydesign.com
Haven't posted in quite some time...
I received an interesting message from someone interested in co-parenting (not specifically with me, but in general). FYI, I know my stance so I'm not looking to be persuaded, just interested in your different points of view on the concept.
What are your thoughts on co-parenting with someone that is not a former-partner (romantic, serious, nor casual)? Just two (hell, maybe more) people working together to raise a child (or children) because they want kids but not the romantic relationship to go along with it. For so long it was man, woman, relationship, marry, then children. Now we all know times are changing and most of that is hardly the same as it once was. So thoughts on a more modern relationship of co-parenting?
Is there any legal procedures to follow. Can two unrelated people adopt a child?
Yes, two unrelated people can adopt a child. There are websites and various forums for people that co-parents already. This actually isn't brand new.
Distance would be a factor for me. Im not putting a child through long distance parenting
Like so many, it's all I've been doing, for the last 7 years, since we separated. We are far, far better parents apart than we were together.
It seems fine as long as everyone agrees that the child's needs are what matters and not petty jealousies or outdoing the other adult. Like marriage, it depends on the people.
Bizarre?
Bizarre, or different?
@Kassandra I can't grasp it. It's just me. I never wanted to get married and/or have kids, so I guess I'm not the one to comment.
But from an outsider looking in, I'd wonder, from a man's point of view, what's the upside of taking on all that responsibility? And we're talking about a 20-year commitment.
I'd doubt many men would be interested, because no romance, no stable home life, just neverending demands on time, resources, everything
This post is quite compelling. Thanks. I really don't see a problem with co-parenting. Some families will be better and some worse, just like all other families. I think I would like to be a co-parent but it might have to be like a 60-40 relationship because I am getting too old and my wife has a chronic illness.
Gender does not determine who is or is not a good parent. How many children have been irreparably damaged by parents who remained together because they feared social stigma or feared leaving thing their undeserving spouse. Two men, two women, or a communal situation (as long as it's not a cult and all parties are well known and vetted), can be very good parents. As the saying goes, it takes a village to raise a child.
To my thinking, raising children is the most important, and most consequential, job in the world. What would drive that decision for me would be the quality of relationship I could develop with the other parent (before having the child) whether we lived together or not, because doing a good job (not easy under any circumstances) could turn out to be impossible (not to mention being a living hell for all concerned) if there were unresolvable differences. Seems like coordinating that most important job would be a lot easier if the two parents were living in the same location. And if I was living with someone, and could get along with them, and was raising a child with them... I'd consider myself married.
I've never been married, but judging from observing my divorced friends, it appears to me that once you create offspring together, you are married to that person for the rest of your life anyway, whether you live together or get along or not. I'm no judge of what other people should do but I think one of the main reasons I never married (as much as I wanted to have a family) is because I never developed a relationship to the level of stability I thought would sustain a marriage, and it would totally break my heart to have kids and then lose them.
I know the world changes, and I'm all about progress, but I don't see how this is a good direction. It's one thing to have made your best effort, and then make the best of a bad situation, but to do it deliberately would feel (to me) like boarding a train that was already wrecked. For what?
I think "non-traditional" parenting arrangements could make a lot of sense. Perhaps two sisters, or friends, want to work together to raise a child or children. Kids require a significant investment of time and money, and having two or more people in on the deal could be beneficial. We forget that in years past (and during current times as well), children were partially reared by grandparents, aunts/uncles, next-door neighbors: this is just a way of formalizing that relationship. But I definitely agree with the suggestion that anyone/any set of people who want to partner up, need to do so AFTER some serious therapy. Try to head problems off at the pass, if at all possible.
@citronella
Yes, people who already have a functional relationship, especially a blood relative, like a sister, or lifelong best friends, should be able to do that. Doing it as a contractual agreement with a stranger would scare me to death.
I kind of agree with Bierbasstard. Co-parenting is great between the two parents/caregivers. But there are a lot of variables and “what-ifs” if one of the two are not biologically or legally committed. However, you could have that same risk with anyone, even the bioparents.
It’s important for a child to have stability, so if they can provide that, it could work. But there is so much risk involved.