Most are from privileged backgrounds, where they know nothing of firearms, and are accustomed to the "nice" police, and the "nice" military protecting them. Most do not come from the ranks of the working class, or the poor, who know that poor and working people need every gun they can get their hands on, to protect themselves from the "not nice" Rich people, police, and military. Their Libertine fantasies are the product of their bourgeois, and petit-bourgeois class backgrounds.

And there is the problem. Labels don't do a thing for a conversation. They do not describe
anything.
So, I would say about half of the people here are gun owners. And the gun owners here are mostly anti-assault guns and giant magazines.
Is stopping idiots from getting assault weapons meant for the military a "utopian world"?
Is stopping nutballs from killing kids a worthless effort?

Utopian sounds like an extreme. The gun carnage in the US is another extreme. Sane people demand a return to a calmer, less violent country. One with reasoned based laws.

I'm not anti-gun. I am against assault weapons... weapons of war. If you need a 30 round clip and the ability to fire 30 rounds in 10 seconds to kill a deer.... then you are a sissy. Stop calling assault weapons guns.

Not all think they need one without extensive training the vets are a exception we have training and judgement

No...it’s merely that they are more logical in their thinking. They realise that more guns means more deaths from shootings!

It's because they are not stupid! Not complicated.

It's certainly not coming from a standpoint of practicality so it must be a desire for a utopia.