Watched an interview with anchor Carlson(fox news) and BILL NYE ; and my stomach lurched at the distain displayed at reality.
His logic and reasoning seemed straight out of the 1950s. 1)question" describe the climate without man's imput?"2)should officials be jailed for climate chang denial.
The first seems impossible ; probably y it was
asked. Second: if the facts are being hid , this
is a moral ques. and having cases like the
tobbacco industry as precedent could be prosecutable. I believe the GOAL of these
radical ques. is to polarize public consensus;
NOT promote public awareness and knowledge.
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
2 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.that's why it is fox news and not npr or pbs. LOL One needs to sell commercial air time to corporations the other relies on grants and donations.
chiara23k
Level 7
Feb 13, 2020
0
Yes I ALMOST exclusively listen to independant sources,
yet the point is - DENIAL of science is being promoted.
Lead in water; vaccines ; reproduction - we need science.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.