Agnostic.com

2 0

In the battle between tradition and progress, beliefs and science, where do you stand and why?

If you favour tradition over progress, make your best argument.

ArjunMahesh 5 Nov 22
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

It depends entirely on how you define progress and the uses to science will be put. Science has no morality: It is neutral. The question is always: To what ends will science be used and what will the consequences of such use be? Your question is so broad and ill-defined that it is meaningless.

What I meant was when religion obstruct the progress of society like in the case of Anti Vaccine campaign, how will you react to it?

If a religion opposes vaccines which can save human lives and prevent human misery, the religion is wrong and must be opposed. That should also lead one to question real morality of such religious dogma.

1

Tradition can be comforting when it brings people together. Example: The tradition of a wake is comforting for those who are mourning. It is inclusive and helps the process along.

So in my opinion...if traditions do not impede progress then it is not a problem.

Between beliefs and science, there are enough on both sides to keep each other on their toes. The harder time you give science the harder they work to prove they're right.

Betty Level 8 Nov 22, 2017
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:4674
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.