It is interesting how in war we justify killing claiming it will save lives, but in politics, even simply wishing someone's death--regardless of how many lives it might save--is quite taboo. I wonder if this is more tribal instinct or something from our religious/cultural heritage.
There is really little inconsistency, so long as one focuses on the political power factor. People in power make sure the rules work for their security. People with no political clout are expendible or even considered in the way and in need of removal.
As for wishing a president dead, we really don't want to go down a path of even appearing to threaten. Talk about a recipe for our already polarized nation to turn violently explosive.
Only publicly, down through the ages politicians and kings have happily followed the maxim "remove the man and you remove the problem"
Moral political idealism is one of the big lies presented to make the public feel safe, yet secretly ignored in favour of pragmatism in the real world. conspiracy theorist suspect the truth, but are ridiculed for it because the lie is too comforting even when you know it is a lie. Something politics and religion have in common.
Sounds like you are going down the Utilitarianism route there which is very slippery terrain!
Seems the money taps open up faster for war toys than for the little people in a crisis. I think it is tribal with a healthy dose of religion and culture.