I tried it for a while. Even joined a Pantheist organization. If it resonates with you, enjoy. Ultimately it felt too woo for me. Our connections are emotional, not "energy".
I think you're right. Even the word "spirituality" I'm starting not to like anymore, too much religious baggage, I like the word "emotionality".
When I was more agnostic while growing up, I had such an idea - god would be too mysterious and infinite, so couldn't be comprehended by finite mortals. However, I realized that by most definitions of god - the entity must interact in some measurable way. Not seeing such interaction, I shifted my thinking to that of atheism. But keep my mind open on the off chance (0.1% or smaller) that such evidence might present itself at some point.
I just refer to all of it as nature, unplanned and without meaning. We all have our own definitions of all words that we use, so what I feel as nature, many others see as god. with god people see it as meaningful, with nature, I don't !
I think the things that I miss most is the "community" (people connected & local) & the ritual. Ritual is comforting & gives a sense of balance (think about when your timing in tbe morning is a little off & the mental/emotional impact that has). Of course you add a protection facet that says if you have enough faith & believe, a big, all powerful, magical being will look after you & make it ok, gives you a sense of assurance in a crazy world.
I don't believe in anything divine, supernatural, or spiritual. I do believe, based on scientific studies, that certain areas of the human brain react to stimuli in a way that gives one a euphoric rush. The thoughts and feelings that arise from that electrochemical brain activity always conform to one's preconceived notion of god.
I do occasionally have the feeling that whatever "gods", energies, intelligences, cosmic awarenesses, whatever - are in all living things. Humans may not be able to detect , ot communicate with all these life forms - but they have "it". Whatever "it" is, or is not.
Used to consider that but no evidence proves.