Legal sort of question, Americans - is the VP's action in banning experts from certain news networks who refused to carry Trump's propaganda sessions, actually within his rights? Or Trump's? It seems like a police-state action to me.
3
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
I have no idea if it is constitutionally legal or not - but it sure looks bad PLUS puts people at risk of not getting factual information they may need to protect themselves. Which is the oath of office trump and the VP swore to on 1/20/2017; to protect the Constitution and the people of the United States.
I realize the question was about the VP, IMO NOTHING really happens without trump's okay and if trump is not happy with your performance you are fired. It is still only a reality TV show to him and though he can not fire the VP he can fire Fauci or any expert that critiques or corrects what trump says.
silverotter11
Level 9
Apr 11, 2020
0
@Allamanda It is interesting, there is the 25th Amendment that is suppose to deal with a president so off the rails BUT there is too much money, rape and pillaging of resources to be had for the senate to step in and use it.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.