The two aren't mutually exclusive, you can be both, you can be neither

The two aren't mutually exclusive, you can be both, you can be neither

To be rigidly sure is to be closed minded. I think you just are re-evalutating every so often. That to me is how we shoudl all be. Sure, but open to re-evaluating what we know every so often to consider possible new information. That is how science does it. We beleive what is most li9kely based on current information, but current information constantly gets updated, so we do need to reconsider based on new info with an open mind every now and tham.

I think of myself as an atheist, but shoudl there ever be any evidnce of some super natural being,I may have to re-evalute. It is just keepign an open mind.

There simply is not, nor has there ever been, any evidence, facts or data to suggest that any god(s) or the supernatural exists and until some is shown and demonstrated the default position is that NONE exists.

I'm trying not to label myself. I like freethinker myself.

My thinking will never align with the mainstream thought leaders of Atheism, which is why I identify as Agnostic. To me it is a brand issue. Atheism is a shitty brand.