I do ideological propaganda, mostly about behaviours.

Humans create all ideas, past, present, and future, which socially end up as ideologies, religions, etc.

However, humans also live in an inner world formed by, as we interpret and call them, feelings, emotions, etc.

Both worlds are always never total or complete, but we have to live with them (our world) and each other (socially), sometimes progressively sometimes destructively.

What is the measure of acceptance and tolerance towards individuals who are inherently destructive either while seeking power or when in power?

Should we stop our tolerance and acceptance towards those we can easily identify as being potentially having that profile (for example, to protect our difficult achieved Democracies?)

Democracy is a historical process, fragile if we do not keep the limits of tolerance and respect enforced by the law and order and its values assimilated by the new born or people coming in.

For ex: I am tolerant to any different culture (culture as behaviour, it include religions), but I would not accept being submitted by one (culture) who drive its social existence with just one goal, to reach power and force people to be like them (never really achieving that despite the demise of millions).

Should we accept free public voices or public opinions, as we establish for ourselves, for those NOT accepting our historical democratic values?

Can we define precisely our values as positive entities instead declaring them as, We/You cannot do this, etc.?