San Francisco, California
October 24, 2020
Charles Hugh SmithDear Reader,
The belief that the Federal Reserve and its rigged-casino stock market are permanent is touchingly naive.
Never mind the existential crises just ahead; the financial "industry" (heh) projects unending returns of 7% per year. Or is it % per year?
Never mind the details, the Fed has our back. And since the Fed is forever, so too will be the gains for everyone playing the rigged games in the Fed's casino.
What makes this presumption so childishly naive is the tides of history are about to sweep away the era of central banks, their fiat currencies and their rigged casino markets.
The global citizenry increasingly realize that these are all forms of financial tyranny. But that doesn't occur to the Financial Aristocracy, which has luxuriated in the neofeudal dominance of finance — the modern-era equivalent of Monarchy and the rights of royalty.
the guidance of the Financial Aristocracy, so-called democratic governance has mutated into totalitarian democracy, that is, a "democracy" in name only, a carefully managed imitation that props up a facade of "democracy" that is pure PR.
The Fed Won’t Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste
It's pretty much universally recognized that authorities use crises to impose "emergency powers" that become permanent. This erosion of civil and economic liberties is always sold as "necessary for your own good."
Of course the collection of ever greater power in the hands of the few is for our own good. How could it be otherwise?
In this environment of "emergency powers," it's almost refreshing to find a power grab so blatant that its sheer boldness boggles the mind.
I'm talking about the Federal Reserve's FedNow, a proposed system of instant payments and digital dollars.
Yes, the Fed is busy planning a pivot to becoming "the people's source of free forever" to save itself from oblivion.
FedNow bypasses both the traditional private banking sector and Congressional control of distributing .
With FedNow, the Fed will be able to create trillions of dollars out of thin air and distribute the trillions directly into household accounts at the
Endless Free
The idea here is that an economy that is no longer financially viable can be propped up indefinitely by Fed free ; all we need to do is bypass the obsolete private banking sector (sorry about that, buckos) and the equally obsolete shards of totalitarian democracy (Congress, the presidency, etc.) and stave off the revolt with endless free .
The rationale for the system is two-fold: The Fed sees the current ACH (automatic clearing house) payment system used by banks as too slow and limited.
Payments need to be instantaneous and there must be a way to reach unbanked households, the roughly 9 million U.S. households without a bank account. In the current system, stimulus payments couldn't reach these households quickly.
The solution is a new payment system in which every household and business in the nation would have an account at FedNow, so the Fed can transfer funds directly and instantaneously into every household account (and presumably every business that the Fed has chosen to fund).
The second part of FedNow is the creation of a digital dollar which is just like the existing dollar with one tiny little difference: unlike (for example, a $20 bill), the digital dollars won't be anonymous. Each newly created digital dollar will be trackable.
The Fed's rationale is that panic-hoarding of coins and by households is a problem, as the Treasury has to go to a lot of trouble to mint more coins and print more . The FedNow digital dollars will be quick and easy to create and distribute — and, ahem, track.
Do you see the monstrous power grabs this we're-here-to-help system would institute?
Total Control
Why wait around for slow, corrupt Congress to agree on stimulus, Universal Basic Income (UBI), etc.? With FedNow, the Fed can create trillions out of thin air and distribute the dough to households without any Congressional approval.
What's interesting about this is that Congress has no power to stop the Fed from printing endless trillions and distributing the however the Fed chooses.
As an independent quasi-public agency, intended to be apolitical and outside the reach of corrupt politicos, the Fed is free to create and distribute as much new digital currency as it sees fit.
With FedNow, Congress has lost the government's monopoly power to distribute funds. Congress can still borrow and spend , of course, but the citizenry's elected officials no longer have the monopoly granted by the Constitution.
A Whiff of Desperation
There's a whiff of desperation in these FedNow power grabs.
It's possible that the Fed has concluded that the elected legislative branch of government is now so thoroughly corrupt and dysfunctional that the Fed is forced to save the day, so to speak, by grabbing the power to create and distribute endless trillions to keep the increasingly impoverished and powerless citizenry from rebelling against the status quo.
The irony of course is that the primary source of the impoverishment of soaring inequality is the Fed itself, as the Fed's "permanent emergency powers" of sluicing trillions in free for financiers has goosed the wealth of the top 0.1% while leaving 95% of the citizenry worse off as wage stagnation and rising inflation has eroded the standard of living/purchasing power of labor.
It's a nice trick, isn't it?
“Free”
First the Fed creates the inequality that makes rebellion inevitable and then it rides to the rescue with a power grab that nullifies the monopoly over governmental allocation of the Constitution grants to Congress, and it destroys the anonymity of the "free " it plans to distribute in the ultimate bread and circuses.
That endless free stripped of the last vestiges of discipline will stoke an inflationary death spiral — well, we'll worry about that tomorrow.
The irony here is the Fed is only accelerating the demise of central banking, fiat currency and its rigged-casino stock market with its FedNow scheme to maintain its financial tyranny.
Alas, tyranny is still tyranny, feudalism is still feudalism, and history remains unkind to totalitarian regimes — even those which have morphed into a clever totalitarian democracy.
Clearly, the Fed reckons the public is foolish enough to believe the Fed's will actually be "free."
Check out what you've lost before declaring anything "free."
Regards,
Charles Hugh Smith
for The Daily Reckoning
Mi sono riposato prima a San Francisco, mi è piaciuta la città stessa e i suoi rilievi, così come il casinò [casinoly-it.com] dopo essere arrivato a casa posso notare che i casinò online in Italia sono di alto livello, puoi giocare tranquillamente mentre ti rilassi a letto o sul tuo sedia preferita
Ah yes, the Federal Reserve is evil, paper money is evil, we need to get back to silver, or better yet, the gold standard.
Don't forget the old libertarian standby, "taxation is theft!"
@LovinLarge P J Proudhon, "Property is theft." He also wrote, "Property is liberty," and "Property is impossible."
He wasn't being deliberately contradictory, or even just being French. He was describing the complexities of property in a libertarian society.
"Property" which must be enforced by deeds and claims of eminent domain, is theft. When a tyranny of all imposes its will on one, or the strong on the weak.
"Property" which is mutually agreed to as the rules of the game; for example, your home is yours, my home is mine, money you earn is yours and I have no claim to it, is liberty. We may agree to make rules like taxation by which we collaborate and pool monies to achieve goals we could not otherwise achieve; this is supported by left-libertarians. Right-libertarians tend to see the world as a war of all against all, and reject taxation and mutual cooperation.
"Property" in the form of landlordism and rents is impossible, because it demands Something for Nothing. Proudhon believed that in a libertarian society, land should be the property of those who worked it, or those who lived on it.
Proudhon was also a mathematician and philosopher, and his arguments are rather hard to follow at times; but I think that's the gist of it. Forgive me for any infelicities or misunderstandings.
To be afforded any credibility, blogs like this need to cite the evidence upon which they rely.