Social Darwin is just a funny thing I use. But I do believe in strengthening the gene pool to some extent lmmfao. But not based on race. If I were king, I would give everyone a test - and shoot the bottom 20%. Then, the top 10% would become the leaders. And anyone that did not believe in controlling population would be shot (ie. Catholics).
BUT, hey, good thing I’m not King, eh?

First, who says atheists do not believe in nothing. I am an atheist and a scientist. I believe in the laws of physics and the principles of evolution.

That brings me to the second point, "social darwinism" is a term coined for the movement at the beginning of the Twentieth Century to describe the philosophy of the "Robber Barons" of the time. It was term coined by someone who had no concept of the principles of evolution. They picked up on the term, "survival of the fittest", but did not understand how it applied to the evolutionary principles. It was misapplied then and remains so today. The other choice is its application to "eugenics", a principle applied to Hitler in his attempt to make a "Master Race".

Having said all that, I'm glad you joined us, but rather an inglorious start to your introduction to us.

Huh?