On the epistemological syllogism that "God, by definition, is that for which no greater can be conceived. God exists in the understanding. If God exists in the understanding, we could imagine Him to be greater by existing in reality. Therefore, God must exist." Can anyone refute this argument?
5
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
26 comments (26 - 26)
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.Does this God have a cognition capability unto itself? Or is that this God is only because ones cognition contemplated it? Or, is it that this God is as an object that one cognition conceived that objective to be a God with attributes beyond any other observation? e.g. Golden statue worshipped as a God.
Word
Level 8
Feb 11, 2021
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.