Agnostic.com

6 12

Jesus a violent anti-Roman rebel that was given the Ashli Babbitt treatment.

Willow_Wisp 8 Aug 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Accurate

2

Yup but not shot

bobwjr Level 10 Aug 27, 2021
3

Thanks! Best laugh I've had all day!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Good to know one gets it.

2

Jesus, a literary character from first century Middle-Eastern mythology, who exemplified the story of the Hero's Journey, which is the oldest and most universal wisdom story told by humans in all geographic locations, and in all time periods since humans developed language.

Ashli, a real human being who was lethally misinformed, and who will not be remembered twenty years from now.

skado Level 9 Aug 27, 2021

@Gwendolyn2018

👍👍👍

11

If he had been such, a violent anti-Roman, the Romans would have had some record of him somewhere in their bureaucracy. They didn't; he wasn't anything more than a made up Jewish version of an old well used god-light character.

They do, he’s called “The Egyptian” and had about 30,000 supporters and about a thousand were full on fighters. He worked from the Mount of Olives and attempted to take the city but the Romans cut down about 200 of his followers but he vanished and everyone kept expecting him to return. In the stories of Paul there’s an account of Paul being mistaken for him.
To be clear it’s a theory but there’s a chance Paul might have been an older more mature Yeshua. The problem is when they wrote the propaganda they moved it back in time 20 years, the motivations aren’t knowable, but if the Egyptian survived and rewrote history perhaps if enough people believed it he could more easily stepped back in the role having “returned” but something went wrong and he didn’t succeed.
If he survived as Paul after failing he certainly managed to make friends with Rome, the books of Hebrews and Romans are clearly pro Roman all the way to Pilot washing his hands of it, something Pilot would never do, he was so brutal he was fired and recalled to Rome. But those same books are clearly antisemitic and the basis of European persecution of Jews. The Gospels also teach submittal and compliance with taxation and authority because those people in authority received their authority from God, so conform.
I can’t prove it, I just know it’s true, and if I’m wrong it doesn’t matter because we should not use the Bible as good for anything except crafts and rolling papers when you’re out of the store bought ones and you broke your pipe.

3

Which would be worse... Babbit or bobbit?!

Frodo?

Ouch

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:618683
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.