I'm British, and a Social Scientist, who very recently had been studying all of the subjects within the questions thus, biases my answers. This is why I scored 100%.
Now, an interesting aside. Several of my classmates stiff profess to believe a number of these conspiracies going against our tutoring in the scientific method. This in turn, supports researcher bias.
Add to this, the corroboration between religion and conspiracy theories.

Interesting quiz. Unfortunately for those people who got some questions wrong they still may say that it's the Washington Post and they're just telling you what they want you to believe. So basically it's preaching to the choir unfortunately

I got one wrong because I do not and never did believe that JFK was killed by a lone gunman. My evidence is simple logic really. IF the route of the car was not changed that day it would have remained on the Stemmons Freeway and Oswald would not have had a good shot. The car carrying JFK would not have passed the Book Depository building. Who changed the route and why? The route change slowed down the car and without it Kennedy would be too far away from the building.

Picking the true statements was really easy. It was no challenge whatsoever. Anyone who believes any of the false statements is lacking in objectivity and critical thinking, and full of bias in his or her psychological core.

I'm pretty sure I'm living in a simulation.

I used to be a conspiracy theorist. I see the dangers of that kind of thing now. So I got away from the obsession of it. Every now and then I pick up something over a bowl of popcorn. But you gotta take things with a grain of salt. What actual proof do we have that the Rothschild family owns the planet etc? It is interesting to speculate sometimes