Agnostic.com

3 2

So, there are various forms of creationism - I didn't know that. And Modern Young Earth Fundamentalism, one of the variations, sounds crazy, but apparently, this is the group making the overwhelming majority of noise in the media and modern culture.


Modern Young Earth Fundamentalism. Here is where the train jumps completely off the tracks. Modern Young Earthers, for lack of a better name, are the ones behind the Creation Museum discussed earlier. They honestly believe in alternate versions of virtually every science known, throwing away every shred of modern science that doesn't point to the age of the Earth as 6,000 years. They literally believe in Adam and Eve (without navels) and all the dinosaurs on Day 1, fossilization taking only a few hundred years, and all major geologic features having been created in a few days in Noah's Flood. They reject evolution, cosmology, geology, and every science that supports them; which, by extension, eventually includes every scientific discipline. However, in their minds, they don't reject them at all; they fully embrace completely wrong, misinterpreted, misunderstood, and misrepresented versions of them. Their worldview is based absolutely on the Bible as a perfect, unerring, literal historical account. As a followup, they have invented their own versions of natural sciences that they pretend supports this view. It is not possible to be a thoroughly researched Young Earther and still retain any grasp on rationality. This is the group making the overwhelming majority of noise in the media and modern culture, but it's not clear how large of a group this really is. They have the largest and loudest web presence, with AnswersInGenesis.org and the Discovery Institute, though out of 3.2 million Ph.D.'s worldwide they've only been able to find 700 who agree with their science, according to their list maintained at DissentFromDarwin.org. This represents 2% of 1% of people with advanced academic degrees.


Read on: [skeptoid.com]

Ryo1 8 Feb 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

The seven neat groups given are probably basically correct perhaps, but it is probably not quite that simple, with many intermediates, and a lot of confusion about details. I certainly have heard some who don't quite fit the groupings. And because there is a lot of dishonesty and cognitive dissonance involved, I have met with quite a few who jumped around between groups as it suited them.

2

The most crazy always make the most noise, but don't forget that they are also the most likely to drive moderate people away from religion as well.

And don't forget even when you quote the percent with advanced academic degrees, that not all academic degrees are equal, and there are some very strange degrees available from some very strange institutions, some of which may slip under the radar and get into the category "advanced" when people make stats.

1

One would think such a small group easy to beat at the polls. Best of luck to us all on that.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:648788
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.