I phrased this all wrong. My point is, as you all probably know, Candice Owens is very right leaning and NY Times very left leaning. When Candice made the statement that there was a lot of corruption in Ukraine in the past, a reporter at the NY Times took note and questioned her because Putin also said there was corruption there, trying to link Candice to a 'Putin' narrative. But it backfired. Trust me, everybody knows Putin is a corrupt SOB that needs to be taken out. My bad,, Sorry. 🥴

There are no liberals.

There are no conservatives.

There are only Homo sapiens,
which are creatures who find meaning by identifying with an in-group,
and fighting an out-group.

The perceived differences are illusory.

Peace.

Yes it was very corrupt, and as Putin says, there is a large Nazi group there. But there is corruption everywhere, and Nazis too. And if I was to place bets on which has more of both, Russia or the Ukraine, then I would put my money on Russia any day. While Putin seems to be quite unaware that he is a Nazi, in all but name, and that terms like, "Uniting the Slaves." are fairly racist, even if they are positive racist instead of negative racist.