This exactly why first past the post democracy is a deeply flawed system, as only those who participate in voting are considered to exist.
In a true democracy the votes cast on either side must be considered as a percentage of the entire potential electorate with a win being decided on a situation where 50% of the entire electorate + 1.5%.
The UK Brexit referendum was a prize example of this
The potential electorate was approximately 55,000,000
17,000,000 (approx) voted to leave 31% (rounded down)
16,500, 000 (approx) voted to remain 30% (rounded down)
21,000,000 (approx) abstained 39% (rounded down)
Meaning approximately 69% of the population of 4 countries were completely ignored for either disagreeing or refusing to participate in a total farce.
Even if we count only those who did vote
50% voted to leave
49.25% voted to remain
Meaning 0.75% of those who chose to vote made the decision for 100% of the total population
This we call democracy.
What would have been the brexit outcome using your formula?
@Lorajay We would have stayed in by a 2:1 margin
Yup. This is the idiocy of the Bernie Bros through and through.
Seems to be everyone.
@rainmanjr Not those that voted correctly...
@ChestRockfield There currently is no "correct" way to vote. Humans are turning out to be incapable of handling co-existence so it's time for us all to go. Sooner the better so we don't fuck up Mars.
@rainmanjr That's another topic, and I don't disagree. As for our current state where there's no magical button that ends all human life, there was a correct vote in '16.
@ChestRockfield In the general, there was, and I cast that vote. In the caucus I cast it for Bernie (2016 and 2020). Defeat shouldn't mean ultimate defeat but purists lose that sense of mission.
@rainmanjr My rule is always vote for the candidate you think would be the best in the primary and always vote for the better candidate/lesser of two evils in the general. Because of Duverger's Law, literally nothing else makes sense in a two party system.