This latest SCOTUS case where the woman wants to be able to deny certain people from her place of business.
In this case the continued dehumanization of gays.
When the xtian fable book does not even address gay marriage.
Divorce - Adultery - and - Remarriage though?
I put no validity to anything in that nonsense. But I would bet more money than I will ever see that this hypo-twit would take money from a couple remarrying who had cheated on their spouses.
YEP~ ♤♤♤ SERVE
the public//// that why YOU HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF OPPERATION & yes
tax privileges that I don't or couldn't
claim..
BUSINESS AS human=⏸
If they do operate in such a manner, they should have a large prominent sign declaring such discrimination as well as include it in all advertising.
This way, most other people could avoid them as well. Their clientele would consist only of haters.
I bet she would do it even if she caught them coming out of the motel when they were married to somebody else.
I used to have to travel with a very married woman who homeschooled her kids because of the gay issue which she considered an abomination. She was our team leader and often cooked up conferences just so she could see her married boyfriend. We went to his home base for a meeting and he came to the meeting moaning about his poor father who was about to lose his leg because of diabetes. That evening he was at happy hour feeling of his girlfriend's leg under the table and when I asked about his father he said he survived the amputation just fine and his wife was sitting with him. That's what I call an abomination.
Like dumpety cheating on the mothers of all of his children.