23and Me DNA test results just came in and I was surprised to find that there is no Native blood in me as I had long suspected, instead I am 100% European in ancestory and my roots are almost completely in North America which makes sense because of my family's long history on this continent. The nice thing is that I found that I have no genetic predispositions to any major diseases.
Has anyone else mailed off some spit for their DNA test results? If so, were you satisfied with the results?
Really didn't tell me anything I already know.
True, it's not the be all and end all but I did find it gave me some info that I wasn't sure about and it dispelled a theory that there was a native component in my background, most of the older Canadian families have some native in their background just because there were about 10 white men for every white woman back in the 1700's. Some of my relatives have very dark hair, dark complexion and dark eyes with native features but apparently that is just coincidental if the DNA search is accurate.
Did the results of your test give you all the details you desired?
My father was adopted back in 1929 so that side of my family is a bit of a black hole, records have long since been destroyed so DNA is my only shot at uncovering info on my father's side of my genetic make up. I'm in touch with a woman in Alberta as a result of this DNA test and I am sorting through that info to confirm that she is on my paternal side, time will tell. I expect more data will be forthcoming as the genetic data base grows, at the moment I would give it an 8 out of 10 score.
This is a great article that summarizes this type of testing and how variable it is. [now.tufts.edu]
Hope this helps!
I agree completely, the data base is small and will probably become more accurate over time as the base grows. For $249 CAN I don't expect a detailed analysis but I would like to get some information on my father's genetic history because he was adopted at birth and the files were sealed and now destroyed which leaves me with a black hole on one side of my family tree. Good info and it takes away the magic wand effect that genetics has on some people, although 3 years studying Life Sciences at U of Guelph allowed me to go into this with open eyes. Thanks for sharing this info and I like your forum name too.
It is all a con, sorry. All they do is research back in you ancestry history and take the information from there. Try it, give them your wife's sample and your details and you will get back your history.
Nope. My adopted family are all Swedish. I have a very Swedish last name. Results came back with no Scandinavian whatsoever.
My husband ordered us both kits from Ancestery DNA a few months ago. When we got our results most of what I knew was verified, of being 90% English DNA the only thing that really surpised me was that one of my great grandmothers was an Irish Immigrant and I only had 4% Irish and some Russian peppered in.
There also was no Norweigian DNA when my Great Grandfathers family migrated from Norway to Canada when Nazis took over his family home to use for communication tower.
Though Ancestry did nail the migration pattern perfectly with all we knew of tracing my other grandmothers family history, with them migrating to Newfoundland, Canada in the late 1600s with a great grandfather a few times past being an English Naval captain. (They found captains logs and Union Jack in attic of 200 year old family home a few years back while renovating).
My husband on the other hand who thought he was second generation Mexican American came out as being 64% Native American and he had more Irish DNA than I did! He then found out both his grandfathers were both Americans born in USA.
It explained why his beard grows out bright red and our youngest son has red hair when no one in my family that I know of has.
We did get a kick over how he had a few relatives who weren't pleased he was marrying a "white girl" knowing now he wasn't the only one who had. He always told them "shes Canadian here on a green card so get over it!" Now he has a few more creative responses to it next time it comes up.
At 68 years old, no children, no wife, very few if any blood relatives, I really don't care what they do with it. Unless I commit a crime or get charged with rape, which is not likely to happen, I. Don't. Care.
I was going to do this, but then I saw this . . .
"we’re guessing that when you signed up for Ancestry or 23andMe, you probably didn’t read the fine print to find out what, exactly, those companies plan to do with your data. We can’t blame you—they’re long, boring polices written in legalese that’s difficult to understand. If you actually read those policies, though, you might not have gone ahead with the test. It turns out that the breadth of rights you are giving away to your DNA is kind of terrifying.
Lucky for you, Gizmodo slogged though every line of Ancestry.com, 23andMe, and Helix’s privacy, terms of service, and research policies with the help of experts in privacy, law and consumer protection. It wasn’t fun. We fell asleep at least once. And what we found wasn’t pretty.
“It’s basically like you have no privacy, they’re taking it all,” said Joel Winston, a consumer protection lawyer. “When it comes to DNA tests, don’t assume you have any rights.”
In general, it’s always a good idea to read the terms before you click. But because we know there’s a good chance you won’t, here’s what you need to know before giving away your genetic information.
Testing companies can claim ownership of your DNA"
No problem, I read the fine print because I generally do since that was part of my job before I retired. I know what I was giving up and I know how easy it would be to take this information without my consent as well. No illusions about living in a totally free utopia but it was a good deal for me. There are restrictions on what can be done with the DNA and if it can be kept, I crossed out some of those clauses because I wasn't comfortable with them.
Yeah, there's a terrifying ScFi book about this kind of scenario. Michael Crichton's Next [en.wikipedia.org]
@Surfpirate I was interested for genological reasons, hereditary diseases and what not.
BUT, if they are going to share that with Insurance companies (and they can)
And then deny my grandkids or greatgrandkids (if the planets still around, which I find quite doubtful)
Then it would be irresponsible of me to do it.
I felt like I needed a lawyer to draw up a contract for it,and thats not their quick and easy DNA test, thats a costly undertaking.
@Davesnothere true, that would be a concern if I were an American with all those HMO's and crooked health insurance companies. Fortunately I have no predispositions and even if I did it wouldn't matter as a Canadian but I can appreciate your concern.
@Surfpirate Hey, as long as your watchin your back
@Davesnothere 2nd nature or I'd be dead long before now.
I did a 23 and Me as well. Turned out I have zero Scandinavian or Russian despite what others thought. I'm mostly 'British/Irish' and some 'largely Western European' which, I think, is genetics-ese for 'I dunno, white?'
I'm adopted and it was a closed adoption, as was standard for 1974, so this is the best I've got. :/
I understand,my dad was adopted back in 1930 and there is no history to trace so DNA is all I have to work with as far as his half of my genetic make up. My father has rather Jewish features so many of my Jewish friends would always joke with me that I was one of them, sometimes only half jokingly. Turns out the DNA says no way to Ashkenazi connection, some old friends will be disappointed.