JUST IN: WEF Climate Scientist Carlos Nobre says 2023 was the hottest year in 125,000 years, but he doesn't understand why so many people no longer trust the science. From climate science to C-19 mRNA shots. He asks, why are people voting for populist anti-science candidates?
The Mid-Holcene Thermal Maximum…
Our planet’s climate has undergone significant fluctuations throughout its history, with periods of warmth and coldness alternating over vast timescales.
One such period of remarkable warmth, known as the Mid-Holocene Thermal Maximum (HTM), occurred between roughly 9,000 and 5,000 years ago, during the early to mid-Holocene epoch.
Despite the preindustrial levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, the Northern Hemisphere experienced temperatures considerably warmer than modern [times].
This period was characterized by increased summer solar insolation, which led to a rise in global temperatures. The HTM was particularly pronounced in the Northern Hemisphere, where some regions experienced warming of up to 9°C (16°F) compared to preindustrial levels. [principia-scientific.com]
Note that our current warming has been 1.1 °C since 1880.
many sheep believe the WEF their cries of climate change, still the davos group land with 400 private jets that they fly around on weekly.
Looked the bio up. Education-"prefer not to say." Actually, says a lot.
and who's bio did you look up? that important to know who
Nobel Laureate Carlos Nobre is one of Brazil’s top climate scientists and member of the Brazilian Academy of Science
@jackjr Carlos Nobre [rainforest.xprize.org] he's highly acclaimed but who's paying his wage and who's donating to his shit! he's a paid shill
he's paid shill from the rockefella foundation a fucking enemy of the people [rockefellerfoundation.org]
@jackjr Dr. Matthew Wielicki In conclusion: You did not just live through the hottest year ever.
Despite the lower levels of atmospheric CO2 during the HTM compared to modern [times], the Northern Hemisphere experienced significantly warmer temperatures.
This phenomenon underscores the complex interplay of various factors influencing Earth’s climate, including solar insolation, orbital changes, and natural feedback mechanisms in the climate system.
The HTM provides critical insights into natural climate variability and serves as valuable context for evaluating the modest warming we are currently experiencing.
So, if you are one of the 87 percent of people who live in the Northern Hemisphere, you did NOT just live through the hottest year in the last 125,000.
@jackjr [matthewwielicki.com] in case you were speaking about this guy Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Of course, nothing is to be believed if it comes from the global scientific community. Only trust those who think they know better. Any wonder why we have so many who think the last election was stolen!?
ah yes the climate believer...just like god some believe he/her exist too. you been told about the climate for the last 40 years but you really studied it you just listen to the little snigglets of information on the radio an see the headlines in the daily paper and them shouting at you on the MSM media. and now here you are telling me how stupid i am..... listen to real scientist like Patrick Moore, Tim Ball...the scientist at NOAA, IPPC, may universities sell the shit because big money influence the narrative
[wattsupwiththat.com] Official NOAA temperature stations produce corrupted data due to purposeful placement in man-made hot spots
Nationwide study follows up widespread corruption and heat biases found at NOAA stations in 2009, and the heat-bias distortion problem is even worse now
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL (July 27, 2022) – A new study, Corrupted Climate Stations: The Official U.S. Surface Temperature Record Remains Fatally Flawed, finds approximately 96 percent of U.S. temperature stations used to measure climate change fail to meet what the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) considers to be “acceptable” and uncorrupted placement by its own published standards. you might not want to believe this as it the same story with you voting you will say when biden doesn't get elected! i bet you will be crying about election fraud LOL
@Grinch1970 why does that matter they have news and opinions from all kinds of sources in doesn't make them wrong...
[c3headlines.com] abandoning science for political narrative is dangerous game. Scientific Empirical Evidence Under Attack: The Uniparty Embraces Falsehoods
It is simply no longer debatable that most Democrat politicians, and quite a few Republicans, have chosen to turn their backs on scientific factual evidence, and instead, they now embrace falsehoods that support a wide variety of Uniparty establishment political narratives and desires.
@Grinch1970 [c3headlines.com] abandoning science for political narrative is dangerous game. Scientific Empirical Evidence Under Attack: The Uniparty Embraces Falsehoods
It is simply no longer debatable that most Democrat politicians, and quite a few Republicans, have chosen to turn their backs on scientific factual evidence, and instead, they now embrace falsehoods that support a wide variety of Uniparty establishment political narratives and desires.